Eric Blake ebb9 at byu.net writes:
| * libltdl/m4/ltdl.m4 (_LT_LIBSOURCES): Delete.
| (LTDL_INIT): Ignore arguments to AC_LIBSOURCES during _LTDL_SETUP,
| on the assumption that libtoolize correctly installed them.
|
|
| Looks good to me. Please apply.
Applied.
Bah. I had tested with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Gary V. Vaughan on 5/16/2008 11:07 AM:
| Subject: [PATCH] Kill _LT_LIBSOURCES; it wasn't checking anything useful.
|
| * libltdl/m4/ltdl.m4 (_LT_LIBSOURCES): Delete.
| (LTDL_INIT): Ignore arguments to AC_LIBSOURCES during _LTDL_SETUP,
|
Hi Eric,
On 13 May 2008, at 18:47, Eric Blake wrote:
So how about this patch?
From 5160f84d0c1d00883b0db3336d79863286e8e89a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 16:45:29 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] Kill _LT_LIBSOURCES; it wasn't checking anything
Gary V. Vaughan gary at gnu.org writes:
+
+# Like AC_LIBSOURCES, except the directory where the source file is
+# expected is separated from the user LIBOBJ directory.
+AC_DEFUN([_LT_LIBSOURCES], [
+ m4_foreach([_LTNAME], [$1], [
+m4_syscmd([test -r libltdl/]_LTNAME[ ||
Eric Blake ebb9 at byu.net writes:
Gnulib was able to get away with an autoconf-time check because it
_generates_
the .m4 file that contains the replacement *_LIBSOURCES definition, and
substitutes the correct directory name in during that generation. And with
my
proposed patch to
Gary,
This scrap of email from the libtool-patches list includes evidence
that Ralf ran into the same problem that I ran into today. Something
must be special about your environment.
Note Ralf's observation that lt_libobj_prefix is not set by configure.
Bob
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Gary V.
Hallo Ralf (and other potential reviewers!)
On 30 Jan 2008, at 22:00, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Maybe Mail.app will co-operate if I use a '.txt' extension for the
patch attachments? Let me know if this is better. If not, I'll
post with mailnotify, and put up with the broken message threading.
Hallo Ralf,
[Repost with correct Cc: apologies]
On 30 Jan 2008, at 14:43, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 08:44:51AM CET:
On 29 Jan 2008, at 06:45, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
I haven't reviewed your last two pending patches yet (but I'm not
telling you to
Okay to commit?
I plan to commit this one in 72 hours (or less with a favourable
review) and roll libtool-2.1b. This fixes the last of Eric's recently
reported bugs, making a patch to build M4 with nonrecursive libltdl
possible :-)
from Gary V. Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 29 Jan 2008, at 06:45, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Gary,
Hallo Ralf!
Thanks for your comments.
I haven't reviewed your last two pending patches yet (but I'm not
telling you to wait for me).
Every little helps, even if you don't have time for a thorough review...
What caught my eyes
10 matches
Mail list logo