On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
With only one bug reported and fixed since Feb 1, either this is the
most spectacularly well engineered release in the history of libtool,
or else it is the least well tested release ever...
I did voice one minor complaint on another list (automake).
Gary V. Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 1 Feb 2008, at 01:06, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
The Libtool Team is pleased to announce alpha release 2.1b of GNU
Libtool.
With only one bug reported and fixed since Feb 1, either this is the
most spectacularly well engineered release in the
Hi Bob,
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 05:21:19PM CET:
Using BUILT_SOURCES is similarly evil to using SUBDIRS to a project
desiring a completely non-recursive build.
I suppose you know of a better, portable way?
If there is a way to replace this with proper
Quoting Gary V. Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
With only one bug reported and fixed since Feb 1, either this is the
most spectacularly well engineered release in the history of libtool,
or else it is the least well tested release ever...
For what it's worth, swfdec and swfdec-mozilla are fine
On 1 Feb 2008, at 01:06, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
The Libtool Team is pleased to announce alpha release 2.1b of GNU
Libtool.
With only one bug reported and fixed since Feb 1, either this is the
most spectacularly well engineered release in the history of libtool,
or else it is the least well
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
On 1 Feb 2008, at 01:06, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
The Libtool Team is pleased to announce alpha
release 2.1b of GNU
Libtool.
With only one bug reported and fixed since Feb 1, either this is the
most spectacularly well engineered release in the history
Hi Jason,
On 6 Feb 2008, at 13:37, Jason Curl wrote:
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
On 1 Feb 2008, at 01:06, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
The Libtool Team is pleased to announce alpha release 2.1b of GNU
Libtool.
With only one bug reported and fixed since Feb 1, either this is the
most spectacularly well
Hi Bob,
On 1 Feb 2008, at 15:25, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Aha! I get the same error if I undo that patch in my GraphicsMagick
working copy,
run bootstrap with libtoolize (2.1b). I'll see if I can figure out
why I get this:
$ grep argz.lo Makefile
ltdl_LTLIBOBJS = argz.lo
Instead of
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
So, in effect, the patch I attached to my last message is the correct fix
for the error you were seeing.
Your micro-patch does work and does not bother me.
Do you think we should put undocumented support for the temporary interface
we had for a
Gary,
It turns out that your micro-patch does not actually work since there
is a failure during 'make distcheck':
gmake[2]: *** No rule to make target `ltdl/argz.lo', needed by
`ltdl/libltdlc.la'. Stop.
gmake[2]: Leaving directory
On 2 Feb 2008, at 01:21, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Gary,
Hi Bob!
It turns out that your micro-patch does not actually work since
there is a failure during 'make distcheck':
gmake[2]: *** No rule to make target `ltdl/argz.lo', needed by `ltdl/
libltdlc.la'. Stop.
gmake[2]: Leaving directory
Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 01:11:59PM CET:
So, in effect, the patch I attached to my last message is the correct
fix for the error you were seeing.
Confirmed. Thanks for analysing this, and thanks also for cutting the
release!
Do you think we should put
The Libtool Team is pleased to announce alpha release 2.1b of GNU
Libtool.
GNU Libtool hides the complexity of using shared libraries behind a
consistent, portable interface. GNU Libtool ships with GNU libltdl,
which hides the complexity of loading dynamic runtime libraries
(modules) behind a
It is good that this is only an alpha release since it is now broken.
Perhaps the massive flurry of changes at the very last minute was not
a wise idea. I have been updating every few days without issues but
today libtool broke GraphicsMagick:
gmake[1]: *** No rule to make target `argz.lo',
Hi Bob!
On 1 Feb 2008, at 11:17, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
It is good that this is only an alpha release since it is now
broken. Perhaps the massive flurry of changes at the very last
minute was not a wise idea.
Well, I only applied the 2 patches that have been open for comment on
the list
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
What does this show in your environment?
$ grep lt_ltdl_dir= configure
lt_ltdl_dir='ltdl'
$ grep lt_libobj_prefix
lt_dlopen_dir=$lt_ltdl_dir; lt_libobj_prefix=$lt_ltdl_dir/
_ltdl_libobjs=$_ltdl_libobjs $lt_libobj_prefix$i.$ac_objext
Hi Bob,
On 1 Feb 2008, at 13:09, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
What does this show in your environment?
$ grep lt_ltdl_dir= configure
lt_ltdl_dir='ltdl'
$ grep lt_libobj_prefix
lt_dlopen_dir=$lt_ltdl_dir; lt_libobj_prefix=$lt_ltdl_dir/
17 matches
Mail list logo
