-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Ralf Wildenhues on 2/25/2008 11:58 PM:
| I believe that backward compatability has been mostly respected.
|
| Yes, but just running libtoolize has never been enough. Running aclocal
| (with Libtool 2.2's macro files visible to aclocal)
Hi Eric,
* Eric Blake wrote on Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:04:05PM CET:
According to Ralf Wildenhues on 2/25/2008 11:58 PM:
| I believe that backward compatability has been mostly respected.
|
| Yes, but just running libtoolize has never been enough. Running aclocal
| (with Libtool 2.2's macro
In regard to: Re: linking a C program with a C++ library on Solaris, Ralf...:
Hello Bob, Tim,
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 03:11:44AM CET:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Tim Mooney wrote:
I don't see anything in 2.1b's info files or README or NEWS for updating
a project from 1.5.x
I've been building and packaging a lot of software in the past couple
weeks on my x86_64-sun-solaris2.10 workstation. I've been using the
Sun Workshop 12 C and C++ compilers for the builds.
I've run into several situations in the past week where I'm building a
package that's mainly written in
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Tim Mooney wrote:
On Solaris, if you are linking against any C++ objects, you must use the
C++ compiler to link. I don't know if that's common to other platforms
or not, as I don't have access to the plethora of UNIX platforms I used
to. In any case, the packages I've
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Tim Mooney wrote:
Thanks Bob, that's great news!
I don't see anything in 2.1b's info files or README or NEWS for updating
a project from 1.5.x to 2.2. I assume that means that there's nothing
a project maintainer needs to do other than to re-libtoolize his or her
project?
Hello Bob, Tim,
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 03:11:44AM CET:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Tim Mooney wrote:
I don't see anything in 2.1b's info files or README or NEWS for updating
a project from 1.5.x to 2.2. I assume that means that there's nothing
a project maintainer needs to
