On 6/16/2010 8:30 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
It was the easiest I could come up with after experimenting a lot. That
wasn't yesterday though, but IIRC if you want to convert paths with
spaces, you need to quote the $path for cmd, hence the quotes in the
echo $path construct. The space before the
Hi Ralf!
Den 2010-06-14 22:40 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
[ adding automake-patches; this is
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.general/10927/focus=10954 ]
* Peter Rosin wrote on Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 09:35:45AM CEST:
Den 2010-06-12 10:05 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
Well, I sort of
Hi Ralf,
Den 2010-06-12 10:05 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
* Peter Rosin wrote on Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 12:49:18AM CEST:
The above may sound as if I'm opposed to moving the script to
automake, but I'm not. I'm mostly afraid of the script ending up
where the cccl script - or should I say script_s_ -
[ adding automake-patches; this is
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.general/10927/focus=10954 ]
* Peter Rosin wrote on Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 09:35:45AM CEST:
Den 2010-06-12 10:05 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
Well, I sort of figured that the 'compile' script could end up absorbing
* Peter Rosin wrote on Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 12:49:18AM CEST:
Ok, let's take a step back. This is no longer really merging
work from the branch, so since A) using MS lib as archiver isn't
essential for MSVC support (at least I don't think so, I can't
remember any case where binutils ar hasn't
Hi!
Ok, let's take a step back. This is no longer really merging
work from the branch, so since A) using MS lib as archiver isn't
essential for MSVC support (at least I don't think so, I can't
remember any case where binutils ar hasn't worked for me, but
ar creates archives that are different so
Hi Gary!
Den 2010-06-09 16:46 skrev Gary V. Vaughan:
Hi Peter,
[[Adding libtool list]]
On 9 Jun 2010, at 20:21, Peter Rosin wrote:
Den 2010-06-09 14:50 skrev Gary V. Vaughan:
As far as I can tell, you are eminently more qualified than me to know
whether your patches are likely to have
Hi Peter,
On 10 Jun 2010, at 14:35, Peter Rosin wrote:
Den 2010-06-09 16:46 skrev Gary V. Vaughan:
As far as I can tell, you are eminently more qualified than me to know
whether your patches are likely to have issues. If we can't do a straight
merge from your branch to master after 2.2.10 is
Den 2010-06-10 11:14 skrev Gary V. Vaughan:
8c17887ee34e73a2aeb127b94f5b76f45dc34017
Why so much cruft in ltmain.m4sh just to drive a different archiver? It
seems to me that this would be better and easier to maintain, test and extend
as a whole new script. Let's call it,
Hi Peter,
On 10 Jun 2010, at 20:55, Peter Rosin wrote:
Den 2010-06-10 11:14 skrev Gary V. Vaughan:
8c17887ee34e73a2aeb127b94f5b76f45dc34017
Why so much cruft in ltmain.m4sh just to drive a different archiver? It
seems to me that this would be better and easier to maintain, test and
Hello,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 04:35:41PM CEST:
On 10 Jun 2010, at 20:55, Peter Rosin wrote:
However, I guess the situation is very much the same as with
$CC and the compile script and that seems to work. I just don't
understand exactly how.
That's pretty much an
Hi Peter,
[[Adding libtool list]]
On 9 Jun 2010, at 20:21, Peter Rosin wrote:
Den 2010-06-09 14:50 skrev Gary V. Vaughan:
[[...]] we can begin to evaluate whether to use pr-support-msvc-branch
in 2.2.12, or wait for 2.4.0.
I don't really care how the merge happens as long as something is
On 06/09/2010 04:46 PM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Why so much cruft in ltmain.m4sh just to drive a different archiver? It
seems to me that this would be better and easier to maintain, test and extend
as a whole new script. Let's call it, $prefix/libexec/libtool/ar, build it
from
Hi Paolo,
On 10 Jun 2010, at 08:18, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 06/09/2010 04:46 PM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Why so much cruft in ltmain.m4sh just to drive a different archiver? It
seems to me that this would be better and easier to maintain, test and extend
as a whole new script. Let's call
Hi Paolo,
On 10 Jun 2010, at 11:07, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
On 10 Jun 2010, at 08:18, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 06/09/2010 04:46 PM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Why so much cruft in ltmain.m4sh just to drive a different archiver? It
seems to me that this would be better and easier to maintain, test
15 matches
Mail list logo
