Re: fix ltdldatafiles corruption bug [libtool--gary--1.0--patch-14]

2005-04-03 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 07:40:37PM CEST: Okay to commit to HEAD, and backport to branch-2-0? Makes new tests 1 and 2 fail silently (i.e., they don't work because they use -I, but report success). Fixes my `libtoolize' corruption. Getting the value of

Re: fix ltdldatafiles corruption bug [libtool--gary--1.0--patch-14]

2005-04-03 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Sorry.. * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 10:10:43AM CEST: * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 07:40:37PM CEST: With this applied, the following test shows some problems: current `serial' computation is flawed (sorry, I should've checked more carefully before),

Re: echo audit of libtool.m4

2005-04-03 Thread Robert Ögren
Hi Ralf, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Somebody please look over this and test. For HEAD, should apply to branch-2-0 as well, modulo trivial rejects. I tested it on Cygwin with lt_ECHO='printf %s\n' and it fixed many of the testcase errors I previously reported. To take care of the remaining errors, a

Re: echo audit of libtool.m4

2005-04-03 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Robert, * Robert Ögren wrote on Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 05:04:12PM CEST: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Somebody please look over this and test. For HEAD, should apply to branch-2-0 as well, modulo trivial rejects. I tested it on Cygwin with lt_ECHO='printf %s\n' and it fixed many of the