Oops, one more thing:
+eval set program $library_and_module
I guess you can prevent a future patch from Roumen by changing
that to program$EXEEXT
Cheers,
Peter
Hello Peters,
* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 05:35:33AM CEST:
On Sep 6, 2009, at 2:44 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
+for tag in CC CXX F77 FC; do
+ if $LIBTOOL --tag=$tag 21 | grep 'unknown tag'; then
+continue
+ fi
I get test failures for this test on a darwin system
* Peter Rosin wrote on Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 07:57:52PM CEST:
Den 2009-09-06 11:44 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
* Peter Rosin wrote on Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 10:31:14PM CEST:
If the test is going to be good enough on w32 I don't know. For gcc
it should behave just as on any unix, so what's left is my
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.1/changes.html) so the 3.0 border is merely a
guess. Does anybody know better?
Pretty sure it was in 4.2 or so.
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.2/changes.html mentions the introduction of
-fvisibility, and the docs for 4.2.x are the first to mention
