Re: make dist failure

2010-06-09 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-06-09 20:30 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: * Peter Rosin wrote on Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 09:00:06AM CEST: Den 2010-06-09 07:14 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: I would like to see more of the story here. If this is still reproducible for you, post the output of make check-local TESTSUITEFLAGS='-v -d -

Re: make dist failure

2010-06-09 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Peter Rosin wrote on Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 09:00:06AM CEST: > Den 2010-06-09 07:14 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: > >I would like to see more of the story here. If this is still > >reproducible for you, post the output of > > make check-local TESTSUITEFLAGS='-v -d -x 77' > > It is very reproducible, e

Re: [libtool 2.2.8] testsuite: 34 43 67 102 failed (OSF/1 5.1 (old))

2010-06-09 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Jay, * Jay K wrote on Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 06:17:49PM CEST: > bash-4.1$ /home/jayk/src/gcc-4.5.0/config.guess > alphaev67-dec-osf5.1 > > ash-4.1$ uname > OSF1 V5.1 732 alpha > > An old odd out of support host, not even 5.1a, but that's your point, eh? :) > > Not sure there's any rpath s

Re: F13 SELinux failure

2010-06-09 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On 06/08/2010 11:55 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: This skips a bit more than is absolutely needed (only the demo-exec run after demo-nopic and demo-make would need to be skipped), but I don't see a big problem with that. We can fix that when we rename tests to have unique names (e.g., to allow par

Re: [libtool 2.2.8] testsuite: 24 102 failed

2010-06-09 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hallo Ralf, On 9 Jun 2010, at 03:48, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > We have workarounds in most Java tests but not in this one, e.g., > convenience.at or infer-tag.at. So I guess that calls for factorization > of the issue. The convenience test needs executability, the rest only > linkability. These