Re: [PATCH 7/7] Prefer $NM @file over calculating the cmd line length.

2010-09-16 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-09-16 19:25 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: Hi Peter, * Peter Rosin wrote on Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:03:10AM CEST: Ok to push this time? Okay. I think it ought to be possible to clean up the logic a bit further, to make it easier to follow when you read the whole paragraph of code, but

w32 pending?

2010-09-16 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Chuck and Peter, do I see it right that there are no pending w32 patches for before the next Libtool release any more (after the one I just acked)? Thanks, Ralf

Re: [PATCH 7/7] Prefer $NM @file over calculating the cmd line length.

2010-09-16 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Peter, * Peter Rosin wrote on Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:03:10AM CEST: Ok to push this time? Okay. I think it ought to be possible to clean up the logic a bit further, to make it easier to follow when you read the whole paragraph of code, but such a cleanup is just as good to make alongside

Re: [PATCH] maint: improve README instructions for fetching latest version.

2010-09-16 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Gary, * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 04:49:47AM CEST: * README, README-alpha (Obtaining the Latest Sources): New section, describing use of savannah repositories and bootstrap. * README.alpha (Reporting Bugs): Remove git instructions in favour of a reference to the new

Re: w32 pending?

2010-09-16 Thread Charles Wilson
On 9/16/2010 1:28 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: do I see it right that there are no pending w32 patches for before the next Libtool release any more (after the one I just acked)? My most recent cygwin-special libtool release has the following four patches:

Re: w32 pending?

2010-09-16 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Charles, * Charles Wilson wrote on Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 08:47:52PM CEST: [cygwin|mingw] Fix order of PATH manipulation in cwrapper * libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh (func_emit_cwrapperexe_src:main): Call lt_update_exe_path before lt_update_lib_path, to ensure that the local OBJDIR(s)

Re: w32 pending?

2010-09-16 Thread Vincent Torri
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hello Chuck and Peter, do I see it right that there are no pending w32 patches for before the next Libtool release any more (after the one I just acked)? there is a mingw-w64 issue i have mentioned 2 times, with a debug log of libtool. Vincent

Re: w32 pending?

2010-09-16 Thread Charles Wilson
On 9/16/2010 2:55 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: This looks ok, but wouldn't the shell wrapper need this as well, seeing that it could be run on w32 too (IIRC)? You're right. I had looked at this before, and erroneously concluded that the shell wrapper was DTRT. But...it isn't. Also, my

Re: w32 pending?

2010-09-16 Thread Vincent Torri
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hello Vincent, * Vincent Torri wrote on Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 09:52:39PM CEST: On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: do I see it right that there are no pending w32 patches for before the next Libtool release any more (after the one I just

Re: w32 pending?

2010-09-16 Thread Charles Wilson
On 9/16/2010 3:52 PM, Vincent Torri wrote: do I see it right that there are no pending w32 patches for before the next Libtool release any more (after the one I just acked)? there is a mingw-w64 issue i have mentioned 2 times, with a debug log of libtool. This is the Warning: linker path

[PATCH] Fix sh.test failure introduced in 72064249

2010-09-16 Thread Charles Wilson
* libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh (func_mode_link): Avoid poor syntax. --- Without this, sh.test fails. Committed as obvious (no, really, this time). -- Chuck libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh