Den 2010-10-05 13:33 skrev Peter Rosin:
Den 2010-09-30 09:44 skrev Peter Rosin:
Maybe the shopt isn't needed after all. If the SetErrorMode call checks
if the SEM_FAILCRITICALERRORS is already set, that could be used to
determine if the CREATE_DEFAULT_ERROR_MODE flag should be added in
Hi Peter,
On 20 Oct 2010, at 13:31, Peter Rosin wrote:
Den 2010-10-05 13:33 skrev Peter Rosin:
Den 2010-09-30 09:44 skrev Peter Rosin:
Maybe the shopt isn't needed after all. If the SetErrorMode call checks
if the SEM_FAILCRITICALERRORS is already set, that could be used to
determine if the
Hi Gary,
Den 2010-10-20 08:55 skrev Gary V. Vaughan:
On 20 Oct 2010, at 13:31, Peter Rosin wrote:
Den 2010-10-05 13:33 skrev Peter Rosin:
Den 2010-09-30 09:44 skrev Peter Rosin:
Maybe the shopt isn't needed after all. If the SetErrorMode call checks
if the SEM_FAILCRITICALERRORS is already
On 10/20/2010 2:31 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
Den 2010-10-05 13:33 skrev Peter Rosin:
I have implemented exactly that and just posted this to the MinGW patch
tracker:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=3081421group_id=2435atid=302435
The silence is deafening.
Chuck,
Den 2010-10-20 17:55 skrev Charles Wilson:
On 10/20/2010 2:31 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
Den 2010-10-05 13:33 skrev Peter Rosin:
I have implemented exactly that and just posted this to the MinGW patch
tracker:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=3081421group_id=2435atid=302435
Den 2010-10-20 18:53 skrev Peter Rosin:
Den 2010-10-20 17:55 skrev Charles Wilson:
if we (MSYS) want to preserve existing popup-showing behavior at all --
which I think we do. MAYBE the following (pseudo-bat-code, where
MSYS_NOPOP is set based on --no-popups arg to .bat file):
if
On 10/20/2010 02:53 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
Den 2010-10-20 17:55 skrev Charles Wilson:
On 10/20/2010 2:31 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
Den 2010-10-05 13:33 skrev Peter Rosin:
I have implemented exactly that and just posted this to the MinGW patch
tracker:
