Hi!
This is very close to obvious and I very nearly just pushed it out, but
what's the rush? However, I will push under the 72h rule if noone
speaks up.
It fixes half the issues reported by the clang static analyzer for
my current pet project.
Cheers,
Peter
From
[Sorry for replying to myself]
Peter Rosin skrev 2012-01-30 15:32:
Hi!
This is very close to obvious and I very nearly just pushed it out, but
what's the rush? However, I will push under the 72h rule if noone
speaks up.
It fixes half the issues reported by the clang static analyzer for
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012, Peter Rosin wrote:
[Sorry for replying to myself]
I do that often.
* build-aux/ltmain.m4sh (func_emit_cwrapperexe_src:lt_update_exe_path):
Remove duplicate strlen calculation.
Hmmm, I like the following better, so I'm going to push that instead,
in case of silence.
Bob Friesenhahn skrev 2012-01-30 18:11:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012, Peter Rosin wrote:
[Sorry for replying to myself]
I do that often.
* build-aux/ltmain.m4sh (func_emit_cwrapperexe_src:lt_update_exe_path):
Remove duplicate strlen calculation.
Hmmm, I like the following better, so I'm going