On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 07:21:11PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Kurt Roeckx wrote on Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 12:10:38PM CET:
There was an error report on the Debian bug tracking system
that lt_dlopenext() sets an error on succesful loading the library
if no extention was given. See
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 12:10:38PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Hi,
There was an error report on the Debian bug tracking system
that lt_dlopenext() sets an error on succesful loading the library
if no extention was given. See:
http://bugs.debian.org/510006
Here are the patches I've made
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 07:31:38PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Kurt, all,
Thanks for the patch.
* Kurt Roeckx wrote on Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 01:22:30AM CEST:
So would the attached patch be acceptable for now? I'm thinking about
adding that to the Debian patch.
Hmm
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 08:16:07PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Andreas Metzler wrote on Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 08:02:36PM CEST:
On 2007-04-19 Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And libtool remembers by putting the library dependency into the
libconvenience.la file.
And that
Hi,
I've attached 2 patches that should get kfreebsd*-gnu and
knetbsd*-gnu support, or more in general k*bsd*-gnu support
working properly.
k*bsd behaves like Linux, but with a bsd kernel. They have a gnu
libc, gnu binutils, ... Some of the things currently in libtool.m4
are actually for the
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 06:32:56PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Kurt, Gary,
* Kurt Roeckx wrote on Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 07:52:53PM CET:
It seems 1.5 and head are a little bit different when it comes to
linking a binary. It seems that for linking a binary it does the
same
