On 9/14/2010 2:04 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
I'm curious to know what the history of lzma and xz is that makes this
desirable though.
Here's some documentation I put together for the cygwin xz package:
xz
This package
On 09/14/2010 07:58 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
* configure.ac (AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE): Prefer better file format.
* Makefile.maint (git-release, git-dist, prev-tarball)
(new-tarball, diffs): Use correct extension.
* HACKING: Update instructions.
Hmm - I mentioned it in ChangeLog, but hadn't yet saved
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
No objections.
I'm curious to know what the history of lzma and xz is that makes this
desirable though.
I am curious to know if XZ Utils has now achieved a proper stable
release or if it will be perpetually in a prototype like state. Its
code is
On 9/14/2010 11:02 AM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
No objections.
I'm curious to know what the history of lzma and xz is that makes this
desirable though.
I am curious to know if XZ Utils has now achieved a proper stable
release or if it will be
* configure.ac (AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE): Prefer better file format.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com
---
Any objections to this patch? xz is a more robust successor to lzma.
ChangeLog|5 +
configure.ac |2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
Hi Eric,
* Eric Blake wrote on Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:34:23PM CEST:
* configure.ac (AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE): Prefer better file format.
Any objections to this patch? xz is a more robust successor to lzma.
I'm fine with, if you also adjust HACKING, .gitignore, Makefile.maint.
We require new-enough
