Since the question asked in:
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 06:49:39AM CEST:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.general/10794/focus=9769.
was now answered in
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.general/11039/focus=11045
I feel confident enough for the
Hi Charles,
* Charles Wilson wrote on Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 05:13:38PM CEST:
On 8/28/2010 9:21 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
[__WINDOWS__, __CYGWIN__, _WIN32_WCE]: Define LT_DLSYM_CONST
I don't think __WINDOWS__ is the correct symbol; that is only defined by
Watcom C/C++. I think this should
On 8/28/2010 11:31 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Charles Wilson wrote on Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 05:13:38PM CEST:
On 8/28/2010 9:21 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
[__WINDOWS__, __CYGWIN__, _WIN32_WCE]: Define LT_DLSYM_CONST
I don't think __WINDOWS__ is the correct symbol; that is only defined by
On 8/28/2010 11:43 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Sat, 28 Aug 2010, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 8/28/2010 9:21 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
[__WINDOWS__, __CYGWIN__, _WIN32_WCE]: Define LT_DLSYM_CONST
I don't think __WINDOWS__ is the correct symbol; that is only defined by
Watcom C/C++. I think
* Charles Wilson wrote on Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 05:31:57PM CEST:
On 8/28/2010 11:31 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Charles Wilson wrote on Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 05:13:38PM CEST:
On 8/28/2010 9:21 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
[__WINDOWS__, __CYGWIN__, _WIN32_WCE]: Define LT_DLSYM_CONST
I
Hello Vincent,
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 12:08:29PM CEST:
I would like to commit the patch quoted below, on the way of support for
LTO with GCC. For that, I need to know from somebody who is willing to
help out with the Windows CE port of Libtool whether the #defines
Hello Vincent, all,
I would like to commit the patch quoted below, on the way of support for
LTO with GCC. For that, I need to know from somebody who is willing to
help out with the Windows CE port of Libtool whether the #defines used
in the patch are sufficient and correct.
This is
On some systems, lt_preloaded_symbols may not be declared
const due to relocation issues. C99 requires qualification to
match for compatible declarations, so ensure we declare
const'ness in the same way everywhere; link-time optimization
may otherwise rightfully complain about inconsistencies.
