Hallo Ralf,
On 8 Mar 2008, at 06:49, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
FWIW, here's the patch again but without mangling. OK?
Yep, looks good to me. Please apply.
2008-03-07 Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* tests/nonrecursive.at: Use -no-undefined for foo.la.
*
On Sat, 8 Mar 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Now, in that test, the toplevel configure script chooses
$top_srcdir/INSTALL (yes, the text file) as install script. I suspect
this is because you have /uhome/src/gnu/libtool-head in the $PATH, the
beginning of testsuite.log reveals that. Why is
On Sat, 8 Mar 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Now, in that test, the toplevel configure script chooses
$top_srcdir/INSTALL (yes, the text file) as install script. I suspect
this is because you have /uhome/src/gnu/libtool-head in the $PATH, the
beginning of testsuite.log reveals that. Why is
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Now, in that test, the toplevel configure script chooses
$top_srcdir/INSTALL (yes, the text file) as install script. I suspect
this is because you have /uhome/src/gnu/libtool-head in the $PATH, the
beginning of testsuite.log reveals that. Why is that, did you add that
Hi Bob,
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 08:07:01AM CET:
These are results of tests I ran this evening. These are all builds
from outside the source tree, including MinGW and Cygwin, which used a
SMB mount to a Unix filesystem.
Thanks for your testing efforts. Can you
On Sun, 2 Mar 2008, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Both are attached in lzma compressed format. I find it odd that the log file
is much larger for MinGW/MSYS than for Cygwin.
It seems that part of the reason for the bloat is that Makefiles don't
make good shell scripts. :-)
I see that in some
These are results of tests I ran this evening. These are all builds
from outside the source tree, including MinGW and Cygwin, which used a
SMB mount to a Unix filesystem.
Solaris 9 SPARC/GCC
===
61 tests behaved as expected.
3 tests were skipped.
Solaris 10 SPARC/GCC
