Re: Optimize func_ltwrapper_scriptname to assume a cwrapper.

2010-06-16 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Charles, * Charles Wilson wrote on Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 05:17:31AM CEST: > On 6/15/2010 3:28 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > So this should be safe. And the documentation is there already before > > the function, too. > > > > Any reasons against committing this? > > No reasons. Looks good to

Re: Optimize func_ltwrapper_scriptname to assume a cwrapper.

2010-06-15 Thread Charles Wilson
On 6/15/2010 3:28 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > So this should be safe. And the documentation is there already before > the function, too. > > Any reasons against committing this? No reasons. Looks good to me (but I haven't actually /tested/ it). -- Chuck

Optimize func_ltwrapper_scriptname to assume a cwrapper.

2010-06-15 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
hould be safe. And the documentation is there already before the function, too. Any reasons against committing this? Thanks, Ralf Optimize func_ltwrapper_scriptname to assume a cwrapper. * libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh (func_ltwrapper_scriptname): Do not call func_ltwrapper_executa