* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 12:30:01AM CEST:
The test tries to ensure that with an incompatible library upgrade,
programs previously linked against the old library still work. This
usually works on systems where different major versions of a library
have different file
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.patches/9063/focus=9113
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:33:43PM CET:
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 05:18:32PM CET:
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Here is a testsuite addition to get some
Hi Bob,
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 05:18:32PM CET:
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Here is a testsuite addition to get some exposure to versioning.
OK to push (and add Mike to THANKS)? It'd be good if somebody
proof-read it so there are no silly typos or
Hello Mike,
please keep the mailing list in Cc:, thanks.
* Mike Gorchak wrote on Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:11:30AM CET:
RW Here is a testsuite addition to get some exposure to versioning.
RW OK to push (and add Mike to THANKS)? It'd be good if somebody
RW proof-read it so there are no silly
Hello, Ralf!
RW please keep the mailing list in Cc:, thanks.
Sorry, my fault :)
RW libtool does not take care to rename duplicate object members in
RW archives on your system. Let's find out whether this is due to a
RW deficient sort binary or func_basename on QNX: please cd into your
RW
Hello, Ralf!
RW libtool does not take care to rename duplicate object members in
RW archives on your system. Let's find out whether this is due to a
RW deficient sort binary or func_basename on QNX: please cd into
your
RW build tree in which you ran the testsuite. Then enter these
RW
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Here is a testsuite addition to get some exposure to versioning.
OK to push (and add Mike to THANKS)? It'd be good if somebody
proof-read it so there are no silly typos or thinkos.
I read it and did not see any silly typos or thinkos, but then
