Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:12:45AM CEST:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
On systems where $PWD happens to not work, we shouldn't care about
performance, they are so rare.
We should define what it means for PWD to work.
My intention
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
OK to apply?
Yes, thanks.
What about eliminating (when progdir='.')
curwd=`cd . pwd`
Do we know when (with which shells) this can be replaced by $PWD
portably?
The ones that are not buggy and comply with the standards? :) (I don't
* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 11:21:01PM CEST:
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
curwd=`cd . pwd`
Do we know when (with which shells) this can be replaced by $PWD
portably?
The ones that are not buggy and comply with the standards? :) (I don't
know,
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:12:45AM CEST:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
On systems where $PWD happens to not work, we shouldn't care about
performance, they are so rare.
We should define what it means for PWD to work.
My intention was to use it only in
OK to apply?
What about eliminating (when progdir='.')
curwd=`cd . pwd`
Do we know when (with which shells) this can be replaced by $PWD
portably?
Thanks,
Ralf
2008-04-10 Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 (_LT_PROG_XSI_SHELLFNS): Move non-XSI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Peter O'Gorman on 4/9/2008 10:19 PM:
| What about eliminating (when progdir='.')
| curwd=`cd . pwd`
|
| Do we know when (with which shells) this can be replaced by $PWD
| portably?
|
| The ones that are not buggy and comply with the
