Re: Status update: pr-msvc-support branch

2009-11-27 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Bob, Peter, * Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:00:13PM CET: > These results are good to see since there has been an expressed fear > that the MSVC support might make other builds slower. Of course the > libtool test suite may not actually be a good test case since it > reall

Re: Status update: pr-msvc-support branch

2009-11-25 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009, Peter Rosin wrote: master again: $ time make -k check *snip* real23m35.390s user12m9.290s sys 10m24.720s This is in a VM on an XP box with some programs started but otherwise "doing nothing"... These results are good to see since there has been an expressed f

Re: Status update: pr-msvc-support branch

2009-11-25 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2009-11-25 17:52 skrev Bob Friesenhahn: On Wed, 25 Nov 2009, Peter Rosin wrote: Today I have tested the pr-msvc-support branch on Linux without noticing any regressions from master in the testsuite. I have used debian testing (squeeze) since that's where I found the required autotools versi

Re: Status update: pr-msvc-support branch

2009-11-25 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009, Peter Rosin wrote: Today I have tested the pr-msvc-support branch on Linux without noticing any regressions from master in the testsuite. I have used debian testing (squeeze) since that's where I found the required autotools versions. I think that people are quite interest

Status update: pr-msvc-support branch

2009-11-25 Thread Peter Rosin
Hi! Today I have tested the pr-msvc-support branch on Linux without noticing any regressions from master in the testsuite. I have used debian testing (squeeze) since that's where I found the required autotools versions. I used ../configure --host=i586-mingw32msvc to build libtool and I saw failu