Re: Windows Line Endings

2012-10-10 Thread Peter Rosin
[I'm going to try to only respond to the technical sides of this] On 2012-10-09 22:51, Roumen Petrov wrote: > Peter Rosin wrote: >> On 2012-10-08 23:29, Roumen Petrov wrote: >>> Peter Rosin wrote: Hi Roumen, On 2012-10-07 11:37, Roumen Petrov wrote: > And now test fail in cross

Re: Windows Line Endings

2012-10-09 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, Roumen Petrov wrote: You just point that you lack basic knowledge and experience with libtool test suite . With recent commits you just ask you commit privileges to be revoked due lack of background knowledge Peter, I hop that after 10 years you will reach level of Ral

Re: Windows Line Endings

2012-10-09 Thread Roumen Petrov
Peter Rosin wrote: On 2012-10-08 23:29, Roumen Petrov wrote: Peter Rosin wrote: Hi Roumen, On 2012-10-07 11:37, Roumen Petrov wrote: And now test fail in cross environment : linux for mingw host Thanks for the report! I have pushed this. Let me know if it doesn't help. No comment. Thank y

Re: Windows Line Endings

2012-10-08 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2012-10-08 23:29, Roumen Petrov wrote: > Peter Rosin wrote: >> Hi Roumen, >> >> On 2012-10-07 11:37, Roumen Petrov wrote: >>> And now test fail in cross environment : linux for mingw host >> Thanks for the report! >> >> I have pushed this. Let me know if it doesn't help. > > No comment. Thank

Re: Windows Line Endings

2012-10-08 Thread Roumen Petrov
Peter Rosin wrote: Hi Roumen, On 2012-10-07 11:37, Roumen Petrov wrote: And now test fail in cross environment : linux for mingw host Thanks for the report! I have pushed this. Let me know if it doesn't help. No comment. Ralf wrote so good code I cannot understand any Peter's patches. Why

Re: Windows Line Endings

2012-10-08 Thread Peter Rosin
Hi Roumen, On 2012-10-07 11:37, Roumen Petrov wrote: > And now test fail in cross environment : linux for mingw host Thanks for the report! I have pushed this. Let me know if it doesn't help. >From 0f31e375104b00a181557d3809e556066b3d98b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Rosin Date: Mon, 8

Re: Windows Line Endings

2012-10-07 Thread Roumen Petrov
Peter Rosin wrote: [SNIP] That part of mdemo now works, thanks! But that said, I'm about to push this revert of one of the line ending "fixes" that was masked by this orthogonal problem. Cheers, Peter From b78fd9740ef6a2ed67a1ef14e76483af784fb5f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Rosin D

Re: Windows Line Endings

2012-10-06 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2012-10-06 07:58, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On 6 Oct 2012, at 06:20, Peter Rosin wrote: >> Over to mdemo.at. It fails on MinGW because I do not have >> any installed libltdl in MinGW. Temporarily moving the >> installed Cygwin libltdl out of the lib search path makes >> the test f

Re: Windows Line Endings

2012-10-06 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2012-10-06 10:13, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > On 6 Oct 2012, at 14:05, "Gary V. Vaughan" wrote: > Scratch that, on closer inspection there are a couple of thinkos and > portable quoting errors in the original port of quote.test to Autotest. > >> I'll push if you can confirm that it fixes the test

Re: Windows Line Endings

2012-10-06 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2012-10-06 06:32, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > I'm about to push these changes. Please let me know > whether it fixes your fortran test failures -- It'll take > me a few more days to find the time to build a Windows test > environment. The fortran tests are fine now. Thanks! Cheers, Peter

Re: Windows Line Endings

2012-10-06 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On 6 Oct 2012, at 14:05, "Gary V. Vaughan" wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On 6 Oct 2012, at 06:20, Peter Rosin wrote: >> And lastly libtool.at. It is only \' that is a problem. If I take >> that char out of the backslashified list, the test is ok. >> Another data point is that if I replace the grep on

Re: Windows Line Endings

2012-10-06 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Peter, On 6 Oct 2012, at 06:20, Peter Rosin wrote: > And lastly libtool.at. It is only \' that is a problem. If I take > that char out of the backslashified list, the test is ok. > Another data point is that if I replace the grep on line 110 like > this: > -LT_AT_CHECK([$EGREP > "$mode:.*$mat

Re: Windows Line Endings

2012-10-05 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Peter, On 6 Oct 2012, at 06:20, Peter Rosin wrote: > Over to mdemo.at. It fails on MinGW because I do not have > any installed libltdl in MinGW. Temporarily moving the > installed Cygwin libltdl out of the lib search path makes > the test fail on Cygwin as well. So, I believe this is > a gener

Re: Windows Line Endings

2012-10-05 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Peter, Thanks for the other fixes. On 6 Oct 2012, at 06:20, Peter Rosin wrote: > My guess is that f77demo.at and fcdemo.at fails because of > different stdio streams in their mixed mode programs. > > Tests 159 and 162 (static library) fails because different > parts of the output has differe

Re: Windows Line Endings

2012-10-05 Thread Charles Wilson
On 10/5/2012 2:28 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: I wouldn't recommend that anyone start with XP these days since it is 12 years old, patched beyond all repair, and quickly becoming defunct. Seconded. A virtual machine with "stock" XP will need several full days of running "Windows Update" to bring

Re: Windows Line Endings [WAS Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-273-ge24f183]

2012-10-05 Thread Charles Wilson
On 10/5/2012 12:03 PM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > And thanks for looking into it. Is there a legal way to get access > to Windows and the various flavours of gcc and MSVC that libtool users > care about, without spending hundreds of dollars on software I would > never use for anything else? Yes.

Re: Windows Line Endings

2012-10-05 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Bob, On 6 ต.ค. 2012, at 1:28, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > On Sat, 6 Oct 2012, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: >> >> I actually run a lot of virtual machines on my Mac, including a couple >> of versions of Mac OS and Linux, and I certainly wouldn't want to >> squander perfectly good hardware on an OS that

Re: Windows Line Endings

2012-10-05 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2012-10-05 22:01, Peter Rosin wrote: > The remaining fallout is libtool.at, mdemo.at, f77demo.at and fcdemo.at. > I'll see what I can dig out... My guess is that f77demo.at and fcdemo.at fails because of different stdio streams in their mixed mode programs. Tests 159 and 162 (static library) f

Re: Windows Line Endings [WAS Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-273-ge24f183]

2012-10-05 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2012-10-05 18:03, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Apologies for having entirely forgotten about the old thread reviewing > those patches first time around. > > And thanks for looking into it. Is there a legal way to get access > to Windows and the various flavours of gcc and MSVC that

Re: Windows Line Endings

2012-10-05 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Sat, 6 Oct 2012, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: I actually run a lot of virtual machines on my Mac, including a couple of versions of Mac OS and Linux, and I certainly wouldn't want to squander perfectly good hardware on an OS that I don't use, and wasn't aware of the 180 days trials, so I'll take a

Re: Windows Line Endings

2012-10-05 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Eric, On 5 Oct 2012, at 23:42, Eric Blake wrote: > On 10/05/2012 10:03 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: >> Is there a legal way to get access >> to Windows and the various flavours of gcc and MSVC that libtool users >> care about, without spending hundreds of dollars on software I would >> never use

Re: Windows Line Endings [WAS Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-273-ge24f183]

2012-10-05 Thread Eric Blake
On 10/05/2012 10:03 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Apologies for having entirely forgotten about the old thread reviewing > those patches first time around. > > And thanks for looking into it. Is there a legal way to get access > to Windows and the various flavours of gcc and MSVC th

Windows Line Endings [WAS Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-273-ge24f183]

2012-10-05 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Peter, Apologies for having entirely forgotten about the old thread reviewing those patches first time around. And thanks for looking into it. Is there a legal way to get access to Windows and the various flavours of gcc and MSVC that libtool users care about, without spending hundreds of dol