* Karl Berry wrote on Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:42:14PM CET:
> Is the intention that even the n...@acronym{gnu} cases should be
> replaced? Then what purpose is the @acronym keyword for?
>
> I wrote about that earlier. Minor typographic change which is rarely
> used in GNU manuals.
Propos
Hi Simon,
Is the intention that even the n...@acronym{gnu} cases should be
replaced? Then what purpose is the @acronym keyword for?
I wrote about that earlier. Minor typographic change which is rarely
used in GNU manuals. De facto standard is not to use it. Which is
also simpler in th
Ralf Wildenhues writes:
> [ adding libtool-patches, in case anyone wants to disagree ]
>
> * Karl Berry wrote on Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:50:38PM CET:
>> I'm okay with changing the m4 and autoconf manuals with
>> s/@acronym{GNU}/GNU/
>>
>> s/@acronym{(.*)}/\1/
>
> So the preferred color
[ adding libtool-patches, in case anyone wants to disagree ]
* Karl Berry wrote on Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:50:38PM CET:
> I'm okay with changing the m4 and autoconf manuals with
> s/@acronym{GNU}/GNU/
>
> s/@acronym{(.*)}/\1/
So the preferred color now is this, I guess:
s/@acronym{(.
