Erik van Pienbroek schreef op zo 20-01-2013 om 15:54 [+0100]:
Peter Rosin schreef op zo 20-01-2013 om 08:32 [+0100]:
But I will hold off the push a couple of days pending feedback from
those actually using .def files for real things.
Thanks for the patch. To help out with testing I can
close 13414
thanks
Hi!
On 2013-01-22 19:45, Erik van Pienbroek wrote:
Erik van Pienbroek schreef op zo 20-01-2013 om 15:54 [+0100]:
Peter Rosin schreef op zo 20-01-2013 om 08:32 [+0100]:
But I will hold off the push a couple of days pending feedback from
those actually using .def files for
Peter Rosin schreef op zo 20-01-2013 om 08:32 [+0100]:
But I will hold off the push a couple of days pending feedback from
those actually using .def files for real things.
Thanks for the patch. To help out with testing I can perform a test mass
rebuild of all mingw packages which are currently
On 2013-01-19 06:12, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Hi Peter,
Thanks for working on this.
On 19 Jan 2013, at 05:55, Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se wrote:
On 2013-01-12 01:26, Peter Rosin wrote:
On 2013-01-11 12:34, Martin Doucha wrote:
I'd like to report a bug in libtool 2.4 (including the
Hi Martin, Erik,
On 2013-01-12 01:26, Peter Rosin wrote:
Hi Martin,
Thanks for the report.
On 2013-01-11 12:34, Martin Doucha wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to report a bug in libtool 2.4 (including the latest git revision)
which mangles valid DLL def files under MinGW and makes the linker barf.
Hi Peter,
Thanks for working on this.
On 19 Jan 2013, at 05:55, Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se wrote:
On 2013-01-12 01:26, Peter Rosin wrote:
On 2013-01-11 12:34, Martin Doucha wrote:
I'd like to report a bug in libtool 2.4 (including the latest git revision)
which mangles valid DLL def
