Quoting Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Noah, Benoit,
* Noah Misch wrote on Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 03:54:14PM CEST:
Here's the current version of that patch. It allows `make dist' to
work on a system with no F77/F90 compilers. Suitable?
Yes, please apply. It would be nice if Benoit
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 07:06:01PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Yes, please apply. It would be nice if Benoit could confirm that it
works for him as well, and nice of you to mention him as bug reporter
in the ChangeLog entry. :-)
Done. Thanks for the reviews and testing.
Hi Noah,
* Noah Misch wrote on Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 09:36:06PM CEST:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 08:38:49PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Noah Misch wrote on Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 07:43:52AM CEST:
I am somewhat concerned about a developer using `reconfdirs=. ./bootstrap;
./configure; make
Hi Ralf,
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 11:13:36AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Noah Misch wrote on Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 02:42:04AM CEST:
Therefore, I took a different approach:
list the files to distribute directly in the top-level Makefile.am,
and do not bother to configure the test
Hi Noah,
* Noah Misch wrote on Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 02:42:04AM CEST:
It was possible to generalize the f77demo/fcdemo configure script
hacks to make them work with no Fortran compiler at all. Even so, it
looked increasingly fragile. Therefore, I took a different approach:
list the files
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:50:41PM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Noah Misch wrote:
`make dist' now works fine on a system with no Fortran. The list of files
in
the distribution has not changed.
Normally I would be more in favor of narrowing the scope of management
Hello,
is there any reason why I can checkout, configure and make all check
libtool HEAD but not distcheck it? Configure would complain (only
during distcheck) that I don't have a working Fortran compiler.
--
Benoit Sigoure aka Tsuna
EPITA Research and Development Laboratory
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 01:47:12PM +0200, Benoit Sigoure wrote:
is there any reason why I can checkout, configure and make all check
libtool HEAD but not distcheck it? Configure would complain (only
during distcheck) that I don't have a working Fortran compiler.
I posted a patch to fix
Quoting Noah Misch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 01:47:12PM +0200, Benoit Sigoure wrote:
is there any reason why I can checkout, configure and make all check
libtool HEAD but not distcheck it? Configure would complain (only
during distcheck) that I don't have a working Fortran
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 02:52:45PM +0200, Benoit Sigoure wrote:
Quoting Noah Misch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 01:47:12PM +0200, Benoit Sigoure wrote:
is there any reason why I can checkout, configure and make all check
libtool HEAD but not distcheck it? Configure would
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 09:02:39AM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 02:52:45PM +0200, Benoit Sigoure wrote:
Quoting Noah Misch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 01:47:12PM +0200, Benoit Sigoure wrote:
is there any reason why I can checkout, configure and make all
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Noah Misch wrote:
`make dist' now works fine on a system with no Fortran. The list of files in
the distribution has not changed.
While examining this, I tried `make distcheck'. It failed due to a `config.log'
left in tests/fcdemo when its `configure' fails. This patch
12 matches
Mail list logo
