On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 11:06:00PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 11:00:35PM CET:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Since repeatedly nobody stepped forward to do this, I wrote that patch
myself now. OK to apply to HEAD?
Yes. Thank you.
Done,
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 08:29:33AM CET:
For whatever output is left done by libtool I expect that whoever want's
it silenced hard enough will have enough motivation to send a patch to
libtool-patches@gnu.org.
Since repeatedly nobody stepped forward to do this, I wrote
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 08:29:33AM CET:
For whatever output is left done by libtool I expect that whoever want's
it silenced hard enough will have enough motivation to send a patch to
libtool-patches@gnu.org.
Since repeatedly nobody stepped
On Thursday 10 January 2008 08:29, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
For whatever output is left done by libtool I expect that whoever want's
it silenced hard enough will have enough motivation to send a patch to
libtool-patches@gnu.org.
That shouldn't bee too difficult.
As a hint, make adds 's' to the
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 04:15:12PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 10 January 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Mike Frysinger wrote on Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 08:58:09PM CET:
On Thursday 10 January 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
What I meant was: even with
make -s LIBTOOLFLAGS
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Bob Rossi wrote:
Well, I might be over simplifying things because I don't understand the
big picture. When I type 'make -s' I assume that the compiler commands
that make kicks off will not be sent to stdout/stderr. I do expect that
if the user has some stuff in the Makefile
