On 06/15/2010 07:45 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Ping! I would at least like a comment upon this, why it would be too
dangerous, and all that.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.automake.general/11229/focus=9626
(No, this patch is unrelated to the -flto patches I just pinged.)
I'm all
Ping! I would at least like a comment upon this, why it would be too
dangerous, and all that.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.automake.general/11229/focus=9626
(No, this patch is unrelated to the -flto patches I just pinged.)
Thank you,
Ralf
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sat, Jan 09,
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 10:45:18PM CET:
* bonz...@gnu.org wrote on Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 09:16:59AM CET:
Here is where I was at. After that it was not immediate how to
use a tag-dependent cache variable. Strictly speaking however
using a cache variable is not needed
[ let's drop automake@ ]
Hi Paolo,
* bonz...@gnu.org wrote on Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 09:16:59AM CET:
Here is where I was at. After that it was not immediate how to
use a tag-dependent cache variable. Strictly speaking however
using a cache variable is not needed to make the PIC test
