Re: strings.h in argz.c?

2007-01-27 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Paul Eggert wrote on Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 03:22:51AM CET: My experience is that everyone who's reported a bug against SunOS 4.1.x for several years, is either (1) doing it only because they're worried we might still want to be portable to SunOS 4.1.x, or (2) maintaining a computer museum.

Re: strings.h in argz.c?

2007-01-21 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Simon, Apologies for the long delay. * Simon Josefsson wrote on Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 01:46:30PM CET: Bruno Haible [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is strings.h needed on any modern platform? No. I see that argz.c comes from libtool. Would this patch be acceptable? I'm cc:ing

Re: strings.h in argz.c?

2007-01-21 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ let's drop bug-libtool ] * Paul Eggert wrote on Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 11:02:22PM CET: Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: We got a bug report about Libtool 1.5.22 and SunOS 4.1.x this year, so I'm not doing any C89 cleanup on branch-1-5. this year meaning 2007? Or in the last 12

Re: strings.h in argz.c?

2007-01-21 Thread Paul Eggert
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: IIRC that was because I could not get into contact with the bug reporter. My experience is that everyone who's reported a bug against SunOS 4.1.x for several years, is either (1) doing it only because they're worried we might still want to be portable