Re: withGCC unset

Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Peter, * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 04:01:20PM CET: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Intended before 2.2? Does not have to be (similarly, this one could be considered cosmetic, and wait 'til after 2.2 - I'll leave that up to you). If you ask me, you can

Re: withGCC unset

Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 07:36:48AM CET: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 11:08:58PM CET: This patch should fix issues with withGCC. Ok for HEAD? My only issue with this is: are there situations where we may

Re: withGCC unset

Hi Peter, * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 04:01:20PM CET: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Intended before 2.2? Does not have to be (similarly, this one could be considered cosmetic, and wait 'til after 2.2 - I'll leave that up to you). If you ask me, you can apply this one now.

withGCC unset

Hi, This patch should fix issues with withGCC. Ok for HEAD? Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com 2008-01-14 Peter O'Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] * libltdl/m4/libtool.m4: Set GCC var for every tag, avoids need to set withGCC var. Index: libltdl/m4/libtool.m4