Charles Wilson wrote:
Charles Wilson wrote:
Charles Wilson wrote:
I'll whip up a patch and post it to the newlib list.
So, I posted the following:
http://sourceware.org/ml/newlib/2007/msg00271.html
However, there's no telling how long it'll be before a new cygwin
kernel is released that
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Charles Wilson wrote:
[snip long description of ugly runtime test]
See
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2007-03/msg00030.html
After discussion with Bob F, I've reimplemented this fix without the actual
runtime test. Instead, if $host_os is cygwin, and
[Added libtool-patches to CC list. Discussion of this patch
should probably drop libtool and cygwin]
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Charles Wilson wrote on Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 08:49:31PM CEST:
Caveat: over a year after the message referenced above, but libtool2.0
is STILL in code-slush, so the
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Charles Wilson wrote:
[snip long description of ugly runtime test]
See
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2007-03/msg00030.html
After discussion with Bob F, I've reimplemented this fix without the
actual runtime test. Instead, if
Charles Wilson wrote:
Okay, here's the first bit. It's pretty simple. Testing is in progress
(and in conjuction with the new argz fix I just posted to
libtool-patches), but looks good so far: the new wrapper scripts are
identical to old ones generated without this patch.
Test results -- old
