Re: Repost: [PATCH] [cygwin|mingw] Create UAC manifest files.

The only comment NOT addressed by this version is: Peter Rosin doesn't want this code activated for msvc, but I'm not sure this patch should be modified to guard against a compiler, whose support (in Peter's branch) has not itself yet been merged into master. And I don't know what symbol to use;

Re: Make deplibs check fallback work for 64-bit Windows and Windows CE

On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 10:32:27 +0100 Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote: [ dropping libtool@ ] Hi Pierre, thanks for the report and patch! * Pierre Ossman wrote on Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:01:40AM CET: The normal check was fixed some time ago, but the fallback code was

[PATCH] Pass various runtime library flags to GCC

Original post went astray somehow... 2009-12-30 Yaakov Selkowitz ... Pass various runtime library flags to GCC. * libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh (func_mode_link): Pass the -shared-libgcc and -static-lib* flags along to GCC. ltmain.m4sh |5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1

Re: Repost: [PATCH] [cygwin|mingw] Create UAC manifest files.

Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Charles Wilson wrote on Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 10:09:43PM CET: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: If the latter, then I don't see how the manifest file ever gets to be installed at `make install' time, nor uninstalled at `make uninstall' time? It was a deliberate choice -- a

Re: Preloading without .la

On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 16:41:31 +0100 Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote: Hello Pierre, * Pierre Ossman wrote on Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:57:23AM CET: Let's give this another go. I've included a patch against master this time. Thanks for your patch and your perseverance. I get

Re: Current libtool tests status

On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Bob, thanks for testing. It was only a quick sanity check for reassurance. :-) * Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 01:22:16AM CET: On my systems (and after Charles raft of submissions) this is the current final test status:

Re: Repost: [PATCH] Document wrapper changes.

* Charles Wilson wrote on Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 09:09:37PM CET: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Don't you need to repeat the menu entry somewhere in the toplevel @detailmenu? Didn't know about detailmenu. Fixed. This has me stumped. The entry was added to the wrong menu, but makeinfo did not

Re: Make deplibs check fallback work for 64-bit Windows and Windows CE

* Pierre Ossman wrote on Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:13:41AM CET: On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 10:32:27 +0100 Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Pierre Ossman wrote on Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:01:40AM CET: The normal check was fixed some time ago, but the fallback code was overlooked. This patch fixes that as

Re: Repost: [PATCH] Document wrapper changes.

On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:06 +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Charles Wilson wrote on Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 09:09:37PM CET: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Don't you need to repeat the menu entry somewhere in the toplevel @detailmenu? Didn't know about detailmenu. Fixed. This has me stumped.

Re: [PATCH] Pass various runtime library flags to GCC

Hello Charles, Yaakov, thanks for the patch. * Charles Wilson wrote on Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 03:39:05PM CET: Original post went astray somehow... 2009-12-30 Yaakov Selkowitz ... Pass various runtime library flags to GCC. * libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh (func_mode_link): Pass the

Re: Repost: [PATCH] [cygwin|mingw] Create UAC manifest files.

On 2010-02-21 06:11, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: 3) This patch will overwrite a .manifest file created in the build dir, thus may break a package that create them through some other means. I can't see any package generating one of these. If a package uses a .manifest file, it will be