I forgot to commit the following chunk before extracting the
patch from git:
diff --git a/libltdl/config/getopt.m4sh b/libltdl/config/getopt.m4sh
index 1487755..76f9d35 100644
--- a/libltdl/config/getopt.m4sh
+++ b/libltdl/config/getopt.m4sh
@@ -49,6 +49,13 @@ m4_pattern_forbid([^_?m4go_])
## 1.
Hi Gary,
Den 2010-06-22 14:53 skrev Gary V. Vaughan:
In this case, Peter, would you point me at the followup patches that need
this preliminary prep work? I had a poke around in your git branch but
couldn't (quickly) figure out where this is going... and without that it's
hard to do a sane
On 23 Jun 2010, at 13:56, Peter Rosin wrote:
Hi Gary,
Hi Peter,
Den 2010-06-22 14:53 skrev Gary V. Vaughan:
In this case, Peter, would you point me at the followup patches that need
this preliminary prep work? I had a poke around in your git branch but
couldn't (quickly) figure out where
Hi Ralf,
Den 2010-06-22 22:16 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
* Peter Rosin wrote on Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 03:07:30PM CEST:
So, it's not a bit deal for me to have this one dangling. But that
said, it is nice to fire and forget...
This one is not fire and forget. I can live with fire, but not with
Hello,
we have run into a problem where package developed on Debian and packaged for
Fedora had rpath included in binaries. This is bad and forbidden by rpm rules
(rpmlint will mark it as an error).
After long discussion with upstream and Fedora packagers mailing list we have
found a reason
Den 2010-06-23 07:39 skrev Gary V. Vaughan:
What happened 4 years ago? (pr-msvc-support branched on 2008-08-02)
I started working in this problem space ca 2003-2004, and proposed a
very rough patch 2005. Ralf help immensely and it all got into a much
better shape. 2006 was the first time my
Den 2010-06-22 22:16 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
This one is not fire and forget. I can live with fire, but not with
forget, because the right place to fix this issue is not within Libtool.
So, let's skip this for libtool and assume that it is fixed
elsewhere, at least for now. It's not vital and
On 6/23/2010 3:57 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
For those that didn't know, we have these cl options to play with:
/Tpsource file compile file as .cpp /Tcsource file compile file as .c
/TP compile all files as .cpp /TC compile all files as .c
(but using - instead of / to not go insane
On 2010-06-23, Jirka Hladky jhla...@redhat.com wrote:
we have run into a problem where package developed on Debian and packaged for
Fedora had rpath included in binaries. This is bad and forbidden by rpm rules
(rpmlint will mark it as an error).
After long discussion with upstream and
On 06/23/2010 09:12 AM, Olly Betts wrote:
I posted just such a patch exactly 3 years ago today (coincidentally) -
here's the thread:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.general/8339/focus=8345
Back then Ralf said Olly's solution should not be forgotten, though, but
it seems it has
Hi!
This is basically
Add MSVC support.
9c848f1e8acdf435d019aa80f3f0b0aeb45613f7
but with some things removed, which makes it depend on
the proposed changes to the compile script in automake.
This patch should be a NOP unless you are using the
Microsoft C/C++ Compiler (aka MSVC, aka cl) and
Hi!
This is
For MSVC, embed the manifest as a resource in the executable.
9f550cb81d4dfe4fc8962f23a7eccb1152e5c4a5
and the relevant part of
patch msvc-documentation.patch
06cfce005204bb8ca212aadab38b38c0202ea04e
with @var changed to @code
This patch depends on the just posted Add MSVC
Hi!
Den 2010-06-23 16:47 skrev Peter Rosin:
I'm intend to reply to this message with testsuite results
for the Add MSVC support patch plus this patch for various
systems.
While I didn't see any regressions, I did notice that it didn't
go too well with MSVC either. So, I dug around and found a
* Peter Rosin wrote on Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 09:57:54AM CEST:
For those that didn't know, we have these cl options to play with:
One reference: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/19z1t1wy.aspx
My patches went with -TP/-TC. IIUC AC_FC_SRCEXT outputs FCFLAGS_ext which
can be used as this:
* Peter Rosin wrote on Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 04:26:22PM CEST:
For this patch I'm looking for an ok to commit, but
I'm going to hold the actual commit until I have done
a couple of more things:
* I have a similar ok for one more patch (.manifest
related,
Hi Peter,
* Peter Rosin wrote on Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 04:47:45PM CEST:
For MSVC, embed the manifest as a resource in the executable.
9f550cb81d4dfe4fc8962f23a7eccb1152e5c4a5
and the relevant part of
patch msvc-documentation.patch
06cfce005204bb8ca212aadab38b38c0202ea04e
This patch
* Peter Rosin wrote on Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 06:12:43PM CEST:
While I didn't see any regressions, I did notice that it didn't
go too well with MSVC either. So, I dug around and found a
forgotten gem [1], and updated it to apply on top of the previous
patch. Result attached.
So, I'm asking if
Den 2010-06-23 20:29 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
* Peter Rosin wrote on Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 04:26:22PM CEST:
For this patch I'm looking for an ok to commit, but
I'm going to hold the actual commit until I have done
a couple of more things:
* I have a similar ok for one more patch (.manifest
18 matches
Mail list logo
