Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 07:38:31PM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 03:13:17PM CEST:
Thanks for the review... I've had a busy summer, so I hope you'll
forgive that it has taken me 3 months to respond :-(
Hehe,
This, on an AIX 5.1 below some /tmp-like directory:
$ ls -ld .. .
drwx--S--- 15 username sys1024 Aug 21 09:01 ..
drwx--S--- 2 username sys 512 Aug 21 09:07 .
$ chmod u+w .
0481-014 chmod: not all requested changes were made to .
$ chmod u-w .
$ ls -la
dr-x-- 2
Moin Ralf!
On 21 Aug 2005, at 08:21, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 07:38:31PM CEST:
The c++ template with subdir-objects autotest is failing for me right
now (I think this is because I need to backport another patch to my
local automake-1.9.6
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 04:59:14PM CEST:
Moin Ralf!
Good afternoon, Gary!
On 21 Aug 2005, at 08:21, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 07:38:31PM CEST:
The c++ template with subdir-objects autotest is failing for me right
now (I
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
I dunno. This is the kind of horror that makes me avoid C++ as if it
were perl ;-)
Does g++ come with a command line unmangler?
Yes, it is called c++filt. Does come with OS-X.
If libtool is using the native linker (vs linking via the compiler)
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 05:44:05PM CEST:
On 21 Aug 2005, at 16:16, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Can you get a demangled name of the symbol __Z2a2c?
I dunno. This is the kind of horror that makes me avoid C++ as if it
were perl ;-)
Bob answered this already, but if you
Hi Bob, Hallo Ralf,
On 21 Aug 2005, at 17:16, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
I dunno. This is the kind of horror that makes me avoid C++ as if it
were perl ;-)
Does g++ come with a command line unmangler?
Yes, it is called c++filt. Does come with
Hallo Ralf!
On 21 Aug 2005, at 17:35, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 05:44:05PM CEST:
On 21 Aug 2005, at 16:16, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Can you get a demangled name of the symbol __Z2a2c?
I dunno. This is the kind of horror that makes me avoid C++ as
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 04:21:08PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
This, on an AIX 5.1 below some /tmp-like directory:
$ ls -ld .. .
drwx--S--- 15 username sys1024 Aug 21 09:01 ..
drwx--S--- 2 username sys 512 Aug 21 09:07 .
$ chmod u+w .
0481-014 chmod: not all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Applied to HEAD.
* looking for [EMAIL PROTECTED]/libtool--devo--1.0--patch-216 to compare with
* comparing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]/libtool--devo--1.0--patch-216
M libltdl/Makefile.am
M ChangeLog
* modified files
Index: Changelog
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Applied to HEAD.
* looking for [EMAIL PROTECTED]/libtool--devo--1.0--patch-215 to compare with
* comparing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]/libtool--devo--1.0--patch-215
-- libltdl/Makefile.am
M libltdl/Makefile.am
M tests/template.at
M ChangeLog
Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 08:53:51PM CEST:
Applied to HEAD.
Thanks. I should note for for reference that at least the last case
(both libraries installed, libb.la linked against liba.la)
constitutes a setup necessary for template libraries to work.
Cheers,
Ralf
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
##
-## Copyright (C) 2003, 2004, 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+## Copyright (C) 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2003, 2004, 2005
+## Free Software Foundation, Inc.
How did all the extra years end up in the copyright statement? The
per-file
Hi Bob,
On 21 Aug 2005, at 20:32, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
##
-## Copyright (C) 2003, 2004, 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+## Copyright (C) 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2003, 2004, 2005
+## Free Software Foundation, Inc.
How did all the extra
On 21 Aug 2005, at 20:01, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Gary,
Hallo!
Thanks. I should note for for reference that at least the last case
(both libraries installed, libb.la linked against liba.la)
constitutes a setup necessary for template libraries to work.
Gesundheit! Template libraries?
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
On 21 Aug 2005, at 20:32, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
##
-## Copyright (C) 2003, 2004, 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+## Copyright (C) 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2003, 2004, 2005
+## Free Software
Hi Bob,
On 21 Aug 2005, at 21:07, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
On 21 Aug 2005, at 20:32, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
##
-## Copyright (C) 2003, 2004, 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+## Copyright (C) 1998,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
| I guess I'll leave that to our Darwin expert to fix, though.
|
|
| Agreed. Hi Peter!
|
Hi,
Still majorly jet-lagged (thus reading email at 5:45am :-p), but I believe
that I noted this failure:
On 21 Aug 2005, at 22:11, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
On 21 Aug 2005, at 22:00, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Still majorly jet-lagged (thus reading email at 5:45am :-p), but I
believe
that I noted this failure:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2005-06/msg00144.html
Well remembered! I'd
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
So the better workaround is to add 'export
MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.3' to
those tests rather than skip them altogether?
Hmm, no, you have to do it before you configure and build libtool. There are
other workarounds to the ld bug, but they'd involve me adding a
20 matches
Mail list logo
