* Tim Mooney wrote on Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 10:37:35PM CEST:
> In regard to: Re: Call for help: Solaris C++ and Sun CC, Ralf Wildenhues...:
>
> >>A comment in the docs and likely also in the Solaris C++ section of the
> >>code would be "good enough", I think, unless someone comes up with an easy
>
On 30 Aug 2005, at 17:51, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Gary,
Hawdy!
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 06:31:42PM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Just a slight cleanup of your suggestion. Changes: change
m4_fatal to m4_warn, because we want to be forward compatible,
Agreed.
I a
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 12:30:35PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> * libltdl/m4/options.m4 (_LT_WITH_PIC): Renamed...
> (_LT_ENABLE_PIC): ...this. Adjust all callers. The configure
> option is now `--enable-pic', since `--with-pic' implies that the
> user wants to compile
Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 06:31:42PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> >Just a slight cleanup of your suggestion. Changes: change
> >m4_fatal to m4_warn, because we want to be forward compatible,
>
> Agreed.
I also had to add a few newlines, else we'd end up wit
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 04:23:11PM CEST:
>Back to work today, so no time to generate a proper patch, sorry.
Here you go.
Thankyou :-D
Just a slight cleanup of your suggestion. Changes: change
m4_fatal to m4_warn, because we want to be forward c
Oops, sorry. Typo alert:
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
# _LT_SET_OPTION(NAME)
# --
# Set option NAME, and if there is a matching handler defined,
# dispatch to it. Other NAMEs are saved as a flag.
m4_define([_LT_SET_OPTION],
[m4_define(_LT_MANGLE_OPTION([$1]))dnl
m4_ifdef(
Hi Gary, sorry, Peter, :)
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 04:23:11PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:46:42PM CEST:
> >
> >>The ltoptions machinery has one little bug. Two showstoppers are the
> >>result of this: AC_DISABLE_STATI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Okay to commit (as a single patch merged with --patch-32 posted earlier)?
* tests/demo-pic.test, tests/demo-nopic.test: Use new
`--enable-pic' style syntax.
* docs/libtool.texi (LT_INIT): Update documentation to actually
Hallo Ralf,
Thanks for the review. So much for my thinking this was a quick
5-minute patch, eh? ;-)
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 02:42:00PM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:30:35PM CEST:
This patch co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Applied to HEAD.
* looking for [EMAIL PROTECTED]/libtool--devo--1.0--patch-243 to compare with
* comparing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]/libtool--devo--1.0--patch-243
M libltdl/m4/ltoptions.m4
M ChangeLog
* modified files
Index: Changelog
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:46:42PM CEST:
The ltoptions machinery has one little bug. Two showstoppers are the
result of this: AC_DISABLE_STATIC not working, and AC_LIBTOOL_WIN32_DLL
not working. (The other old-style option setting macros don't wo
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Peter,
* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 05:13:36PM CEST:
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
If you want to work on this stuff, and I can't persuade you to
help us tackle the last few showstoppers
Okay, I guess I can look at the release blockers. It does bug me
Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 02:42:00PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:30:35PM CEST:
> >
> >>This patch continues to support --with{,out}-pic[={yes,no,both}, but
> >>only advertises the more compliant --enable-pic in
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:30:35PM CEST:
This patch continues to support --with{,out}-pic[={yes,no,both}, but
only advertises the more compliant --enable-pic in the calling
configure --help text.
There is no patch attached to your mail.
Okay
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> * Peter Ekberg wrote on Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 12:43:16PM CEST:
> >
> > CRAP! After fixing some problems with this patch (it doesn't work
> > for a number of reasons, so don't waste your time trying) I have
> > realized that sed is not the correct tool for thi
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:30:35PM CEST:
>
> This patch continues to support --with{,out}-pic[={yes,no,both}, but
> only advertises the more compliant --enable-pic in the calling
> configure --help text.
There is no patch attached to your mail.
> Okay to commit?
No, see
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:46:42PM CEST:
> The ltoptions machinery has one little bug. Two showstoppers are the
> result of this: AC_DISABLE_STATIC not working, and AC_LIBTOOL_WIN32_DLL
> not working. (The other old-style option setting macros don't work
> either, I believ
The ltoptions machinery has one little bug. Two showstoppers are the
result of this: AC_DISABLE_STATIC not working, and AC_LIBTOOL_WIN32_DLL
not working. (The other old-style option setting macros don't work
either, I believe):
To reproduce:
AC_INIT(a,1,b)
AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(foreign)
AC_PROG_CC
A
Hi Christoph,
Please don't send to both mailing lists, unless necessary
(and if necessary, don't send separate mails, so readers
can configure their subscription to only receive one mail).
Thank you.
* Christoph Egger wrote on Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:24:09AM CEST:
>
> I get an bootstrap failure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This patch continues to support --with{,out}-pic[={yes,no,both}, but
only advertises the more compliant --enable-pic in the calling
configure --help text.
Okay to commit?
* libltdl/m4/options.m4 (_LT_WITH_PIC): Renamed...
(_LT_ENABLE_
Christoph Egger wrote:
Hi!
Hi Christoph,
I get an bootstrap failure because of
no rule to make target m4/argz.m4, needed in 'Makefile.in'. Stop.
That's odd. Maybe because the generated Makefile is out of date?
The attached patch touches the toplevel Makefile.am
and fixes the bug.
Then b
Hi Peter,
* Peter Ekberg wrote on Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 12:43:16PM CEST:
>
> CRAP! After fixing some problems with this patch (it doesn't work
> for a number of reasons, so don't waste your time trying) I have
> realized that sed is not the correct tool for this pipe. It is
> best written in some
I wrote:
> I wrote:
> > This seems to be because of a problem with the global_symbol_pipe.
> > Consider the following snippet from the dumpbin output from
> > foo.obj:
> >
> > 00E SECT3 notype External | _nothing
> > 00F SECT4 notype Static | .text
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Applied to HEAD.
* looking for [EMAIL PROTECTED]/libtool--devo--1.0--patch-242 to compare with
* comparing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]/libtool--devo--1.0--patch-242
M libltdl/m4/libtool.m4
M ChangeLog
* modified files
Index: Changelog
f
Hi!
I get an bootstrap failure because of
no rule to make target m4/argz.m4, needed in 'Makefile.in'. Stop.
The attached patch touches the toplevel Makefile.am
and fixes the bug.
Then bootstrapping works for me (tm).
--
Greetings,
Christoph
5 GB Mailbox, 50 FreeSMS http://www.gmx.net/de/go/
Hi Peter,
* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 05:13:36PM CEST:
> Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> >
> >If you want to work on this stuff, and I can't persuade you to
> >help us tackle the last few showstoppers
>
> Okay, I guess I can look at the release blockers. It does bug me
> that there
26 matches
Mail list logo
