* Charles Wilson wrote on Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 12:41:08AM CEST:
The only problem I see is if libtool-HEAD-after-2.0 (say, nearing the
/next/ major release) begins requiring ac-2.61/am-1.10 (or even
newer).
You'll have my vote against that happening too soon.
I suspect they will make more of
Hi Charles, Bruno,
* Charles Wilson wrote on Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 07:34:56AM CEST:
Attached. Re-ran *all* of the tests described here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2007-04/msg00073.html
with identical results.
Thank you for patching and testing, and thanks to Bruno for
[ let's continue this discussion on libtool-patches, please ]
Hello Liviu, Vishal,
Could you please try this patch (written for both CVS HEAD and
branch-1-5), and post the --debug link output with the changed
libtool script? Thank you.
The patch is certainly not ready for prime time yet, as it
OK to apply? With this, if only `ChangeLog' (and `configure.ac' for
ltversion.in) are newer than the respective target, we avoid updating.
This fixes the bug where
touch $srcdir/libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh # or edit otherwise
would fail to update ltmain.sh and thus libtool.
This seems to more
