Re: Using getconf to set max_cmd_len

Hi Charles, * Charles Wilson wrote on Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 10:20:24PM CEST: > > Committed (to HEAD and branch-1-5). my sendmail hiccuped when trying to > send the notification to libtool-commit for branch-1-5, though. I can > try to reconstruct that message manually and send it, if you think

Re: distchecking without FC?

Hi Ralf, On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 11:13:36AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Noah Misch wrote on Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 02:42:04AM CEST: > > If better, we could compromise between complexity > > and redundancy by generating the list of files at `bootstrap' time. > > If you've already tried this, p

Re: Using getconf to set max_cmd_len

On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 20:39 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Charles Wilson wrote on Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 08:32:33PM CEST: > > OK to apply (both branches)? > > Of course. Thanks. And no need for my name in the ChangeLog entry. > > Cheers, > Ralf > > > 2007-06-17 Charles Wilson <...> > >

Re: [patch] win32: eliminate wrapper script in main build dir

Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Charles Wilson wrote on Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 02:43:02AM CEST: OK by me. Do you wat me to add your patch to mine and check it all in at once (e.g. keep the new-testsuite .exe fixes to destdir.at together), or will you check your changes in separately? However you like

Re: Using getconf to set max_cmd_len

Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Charles Wilson wrote on Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 08:32:33PM CEST: OK to apply (both branches)? Of course. Thanks. And no need for my name in the ChangeLog entry. Cheers, Ralf 2007-06-17 Charles Wilson <...> Ralf Wildenhues <...> * libltdl/m4/li

Re: [patch] win32: eliminate wrapper script in main build dir

Hi Charles, * Charles Wilson wrote on Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 08:01:20PM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > >* Charles Wilson wrote on Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 02:43:02AM CEST: > > OK by me. Do you wat me to add your patch to mine and check it all in > at once (e.g. keep the new-testsuite .exe fixes to

Re: Using getconf to set max_cmd_len

* Charles Wilson wrote on Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 08:32:33PM CEST: > OK to apply (both branches)? Of course. Thanks. And no need for my name in the ChangeLog entry. Cheers, Ralf > 2007-06-17 Charles Wilson <...> > Ralf Wildenhues <...> > > * libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 (LT_CMD_MAX

Re: Using getconf to set max_cmd_len

Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Steve Ellcey wrote on Thu, May 31, 2007 at 12:58:37AM CEST: 2007-05-30 Steve Ellcey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 (LT_CMD_MAX_LEN): Try using getconf to set lt_cv_sys_max_cmd_len. [...] +lt_cv_sys_max_cmd_len=`getconf ARG_MAX 2> /d

Re: [patch] win32: eliminate wrapper script in main build dir

Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Charles Wilson wrote on Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 02:43:02AM CEST: Now, in this current patch, we only use _spawnv() if $host == mingw. Maybe we could be more clever than that, and only use _spawnv if mingw and native. However, we'd then need to do something about this:

Re: [patch] win32: eliminate wrapper script in main build dir

* Charles Wilson wrote on Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 02:43:02AM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > >Is this code ever to be run on a different system than MinGW? What > >about cross-compile setups? (Maybe you've addressed this in one of > >the comments of all your patches and I've overlooked it now?)

Re: distchecking without FC?

Hi Ralf, On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 11:13:36AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Noah Misch wrote on Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 02:42:04AM CEST: > > Therefore, I took a different approach: > > list the files to distribute directly in the top-level Makefile.am, > > and do not bother to configure the test di