Re: FYI backport notes.texi from HEAD

2008-01-24 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Peter, * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 08:29:08AM CET: I applied this to branch-1-5. Guess that makes the section in README obsolete. Wanna kill it or replace it with a pointer to notes.texi? Erm, C++ code with templates won't fare all that well

Re: FYI backport notes.texi from HEAD

2008-01-24 Thread Tim Rice
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Peter, * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 08:29:08AM CET: I applied this to branch-1-5. Guess that makes the section in README obsolete. Wanna kill it or replace it with a pointer to notes.texi? Keep in mind not all systems

Autoreconf calling order order [WAS FYI: 333-gary-refactor-LTDL_INIT.patch]

2008-01-24 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Eric, On 23 Jan 2008, at 22:00, Eric Blake wrote: The problem seems to stem from the fact that I had an older version of libltdl copied into my M4 tree, and autoreconf runs aclocal prior to libtoolize, so it was picking up the old definition of LTDL_INIT which conflicted with my new contents

Re: FYI backport notes.texi from HEAD

2008-01-24 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 05:49:17PM CET: Tim Rice wrote: On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Guess that makes the section in README obsolete. Wanna kill it or replace it with a pointer to notes.texi? Keep in mind not all systems have texinfo installed.

Re: Autoreconf calling order order [WAS FYI: 333-gary-refactor-LTDL_INIT.patch]

2008-01-24 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 06:19:37PM CET: I haven't picked through the logic inside autoreconf, but it seems completely wrong to me for it to run any tool that affects the contents of aclocal.m4 after aclocal itself (unless, perhaps, it reruns aclocal again later).

Re: FYI backport notes.texi from HEAD

2008-01-24 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 05:49:17PM CET: Tim Rice wrote: On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Guess that makes the section in README obsolete. Wanna kill it or replace it with a pointer to notes.texi? Keep in mind not all systems have

Re: Autoreconf calling order order [WAS FYI: 333-gary-refactor-LTDL_INIT.patch]

2008-01-24 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Ralf Wildenhues on 1/24/2008 11:00 AM: | * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 06:19:37PM CET: | I haven't picked through the logic inside autoreconf, but it seems | completely wrong to me for it to run any tool that affects

Re: Autoreconf calling order order

2008-01-24 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Eric Blake wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 07:57:20PM CET: According to Ralf Wildenhues on 1/24/2008 11:00 AM: | * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 06:19:37PM CET: | I haven't picked through the logic inside autoreconf, but it seems | completely wrong to me for it to run any tool

Re: FYI backport notes.texi from HEAD

2008-01-24 Thread Tim Rice
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: It will also be in the libtool manual on www.gnu.org (which the README is not), so I am not really worried about that. At least with Libtool HEAD, there is a notes.txt generated from notes.texi. Excelent! Difficult to do in branch-1-5? --

341-gary-libtoolize-recognise-LTDL_INIT

2008-01-24 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Okay to commit? Index: ChangeLog from Gary V. Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] * libtoolize.m4sh (Main): Copy (or link) libltdl sources into project tree when LTDL_INIT was seen, whether or not `--ltdl' is passed. (func_check_macros): Recommend LTDL_INIT instead