Re: [PATCH] [cygwin|mingw] fix dlpreopen with --disable-static

2008-11-13 Thread Charles Wilson
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >> The point is, we perhaps STARTED with the .la file, but the whole point >> of the dlpreopen $pass is to replace each .la file in $dlprefiles with >> the name of the object from which the symbols should be extracted, to >> build the symbol table. So, pick one: either the DL

Re: [PATCH] [cygwin|mingw] fix dlpreopen with --disable-static

2008-11-13 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:28:36AM CET: > > The point is, we perhaps STARTED with the .la file, but the whole point > of the dlpreopen $pass is to replace each .la file in $dlprefiles with > the name of the object from which the symbols should be extracted, to > build the

Re: [PATCH] [cygwin|mingw] fix dlpreopen with --disable-static

2008-11-13 Thread libtool
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:09:07 +0100, "Ralf Wildenhues" said: > OK, how about this. It is a slight backward incompatibility, but > not a large one: > - --verbose undoes --silent *and* enables verbose output (that one with > func_verbose), > - --no-silent *only* undoes --silent, > > It should sti

Re: [PATCH] [cygwin|mingw] fix dlpreopen with --disable-static

2008-11-13 Thread Brian Dessent
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > I'm actually not sure whether _GLOBAL__F[ID]_.* can appear on w32. > Do you know? They should happen with C++ code using constructors > and destructors IIRC. Yes they do occur, although not matching that regexp. For one, they will have two leading underscores before the

Re: [PATCH] [cygwin|mingw] fix dlpreopen with --disable-static

2008-11-13 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Charles, * Charles Wilson wrote on Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 06:09:20AM CET: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > Well, --verbose is documented to be a reversal of --silent, and > > documented to be the default. The fact that opt_verbose is never set is > > a limitation. If fixed, that should better