On 21 Sep 2010, at 12:07, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Gary,
Hallo Ralf,
Thanks again for the review.
> * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 03:05:46AM CEST:
>> Well, it does at least show that the script interacts correctly with
>> an error for make to help catch the case where someon
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 08:44:41AM CEST:
> With those addressed, and another successful distcheck, okay to push?
Sure.
Thanks,
Ralf
Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 03:05:46AM CEST:
> Well, it does at least show that the script interacts correctly with
> an error for make to help catch the case where someone commits a change
> to the first paragraph of README without a matching edit to the sed
> express
Hallo Ralf,
On 21 Sep 2010, at 00:34, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> a regression: this code will cause 'make distcheck' to
> fail, because at 'make dist' time the file will be rewritten before
> being added to the tarball (if the version doesn't indicate a stable
> release), then when distcheck tries t
Peter Rosin wrote:
Den 2010-09-18 00:04 skrev Roumen Petrov:
Hi Peter,
Peter Rosin wrote:
Hi!
need_lib_prefix.at currently fails with MSVC.
Hmm probably test fail as shared library is build without -no-undefined flag.
Did libtool MSC allow creation of shared libraries without -no-undefine
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:25:06PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Toshio Kuratomi wrote on Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:20:09PM CEST:
> > On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 04:04:04PM -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > > Greetings. I package software for Fedora and frequently get hit with
> > > /usr/lib64 being
* HACKING: Update.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake
---
I'm pushing this under the obvious rule, given that the whole point
of my previous patch was to remove this dependency, and since this
is a docs-only patch.
ChangeLog |3 +++
HACKING |4 +---
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletio
[ adding libtool-patches ]
Hello Rainer, all,
* Rainer Tammer wrote on Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 12:55:59PM CEST:
> here is the result of the bisect. I had to slightly change your
> suggested bisect script:
>
> if grep 'FAIL: f[c7]*demo-exec' checklog; then
> ->
> if grep '^FAIL: ' checklog; then
>
* Toshio Kuratomi wrote on Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:20:09PM CEST:
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 04:04:04PM -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > Greetings. I package software for Fedora and frequently get hit with
> > /usr/lib64 being added as an rpath in builds. I found what I think is the
> > last threa
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 04:04:04PM -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Greetings. I package software for Fedora and frequently get hit with
> /usr/lib64 being added as an rpath in builds. I found what I think is the
> last thread on this subject here:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-pat
On 09/20/2010 12:44 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Eric Blake wrote on Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 08:13:25PM CEST:
Shipping a copy of autobuild.m4 makes it so that users need not
pre-install autobuild just for aclocal to find the macro AB_INIT.
* libltdl/m4/.gitignore: Drop autobuild.m4.
* libltdl/m4/a
* Eric Blake wrote on Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 08:13:25PM CEST:
> Shipping a copy of autobuild.m4 makes it so that users need not
> pre-install autobuild just for aclocal to find the macro AB_INIT.
>
> * libltdl/m4/.gitignore: Drop autobuild.m4.
> * libltdl/m4/autobuild.m4: New file, copied from autob
Shipping a copy of autobuild.m4 makes it so that users need not
pre-install autobuild just for aclocal to find the macro AB_INIT.
* libltdl/m4/.gitignore: Drop autobuild.m4.
* libltdl/m4/autobuild.m4: New file, copied from autobuild.
* configure.ac (AB_INIT): Unconditionally call it.
Signed-off-b
Hello Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 05:46:25AM CEST:
> On 18 Sep 2010, at 13:40, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 07:20:18AM CEST:
> >> + sed -e '/^This is GNU Libtool,/,/^interface.$/c\
> >> +This is an alpha testing release of GN
Hi Bob,
Den 2010-09-20 17:57 skrev Bob Friesenhahn:
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> I have tested this patch on MinGW/gcc and Cygwin/gcc and they are both
>> ok with the __declspec() notation. On MSVC, the test goes from skip
>> to fail, as it needs 2/2.
>
> This patch looks good to
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, Peter Rosin wrote:
Hi!
I have tested this patch on MinGW/gcc and Cygwin/gcc and they are both
ok with the __declspec() notation. On MSVC, the test goes from skip
to fail, as it needs 2/2.
This patch looks good to apply, as does the 2/2 patch to make sure
that lt__PROGRA
>From 48c28ce65b53af7ad6c1cb84026e47be9ce2d68b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Rosin
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:11:43 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] libltdl: Make sure preloaded symbols are declared extern
"C".
* libltdl/ltdl.h (LTDL_SET_PRELOADED_SYMBOLS): Move the
declaration of lt__PROGRAM__L
Hi!
I have tested this patch on MinGW/gcc and Cygwin/gcc and they are both
ok with the __declspec() notation. On MSVC, the test goes from skip
to fail, as it needs 2/2.
Cheers,
Peter
>From 52972128c5952da628e033e4509208711906c3a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Rosin
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 201
18 matches
Mail list logo
