Re: [PATCH] [CXX] Use correct export_dynamic_flag_spec for PE-COFF $hosts

2009-07-01 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Charles Wilson wrote on Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 06:48:52AM CEST: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Yes but can you please check that you don't need to add another 3 patches for F77, FC, GCJ? Well, the whole tag-based mechanism in libtool makes my teeth ache, I don't disagree. but as far as I can

Re: [PATCH] [CXX] Use correct export_dynamic_flag_spec for PE-COFF $hosts

2009-07-01 Thread Charles Wilson
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Charles Wilson wrote on Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 06:48:52AM CEST: but as far as I can tell we don't actually have separate cases for those other languages' linker requirements at present. There's just C++, and everything else: Yes. What I am asking is do these

[PATCH] [CXX] Use correct export_dynamic_flag_spec for PE-COFF $hosts

2009-06-30 Thread Charles Wilson
* libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 (_LT_LANG_CXX_CONFIG) [cygwin*|mingw*|pw32*|cegcc*]: Define export_dynamic_flag_spec as -Wl,--export-all-symbols here as well (see commit 5f2bbb494a2753afb2878c399cfd8316b7403a5b). Signed-off-by: Charles Wilson ... --- Originally posted by Yaakov Selkowitz on the cygwin

Re: [PATCH] [CXX] Use correct export_dynamic_flag_spec for PE-COFF $hosts

2009-06-30 Thread Charles Wilson
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Yes but can you please check that you don't need to add another 3 patches for F77, FC, GCJ? Well, the whole tag-based mechanism in libtool makes my teeth ache, but as far as I can tell we don't actually have separate cases for those other languages' linker requirements at