Den 2010-09-08 21:13 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
> * Peter Rosin wrote on Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 01:42:20PM CEST:
>> How about the below?
>
> Sure, thanks!
Pushed. Thank you!
Cheers,
Peter
* Peter Rosin wrote on Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 01:42:20PM CEST:
> How about the below?
Sure, thanks!
> Subject: [PATCH] Mention adjustment of naming of MSVC import libraries in
> NEWS.
>
> * NEWS: Mention the change in import library naming on MSVC.
Den 2010-09-08 07:16 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
> * Peter Rosin wrote on Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:23:17AM CEST:
>> Den 2010-09-07 22:24 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
>>> * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 10:20:06PM CEST:
* Peter Rosin wrote on Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:25:00AM CEST:
>>> Ration
Den 2010-09-08 00:23 skrev Peter Rosin:
> Den 2010-09-07 22:24 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
>> * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 10:20:06PM CEST:
>>> * Peter Rosin wrote on Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:25:00AM CEST:
>>>> Subject: [PATCH] Adjust n
* Peter Rosin wrote on Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:23:17AM CEST:
> Den 2010-09-07 22:24 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
> > * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 10:20:06PM CEST:
> >> * Peter Rosin wrote on Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:25:00AM CEST:
> > Rationale: you don't, and can't, and won't, be able t
Hi Ralf!
Den 2010-09-07 22:24 skrev Ralf Wildenhues:
> * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 10:20:06PM CEST:
>> * Peter Rosin wrote on Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:25:00AM CEST:
>>> Subject: [PATCH] Adjust naming of MSVC import libraries.
>>>
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 10:20:06PM CEST:
> * Peter Rosin wrote on Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:25:00AM CEST:
> > Subject: [PATCH] Adjust naming of MSVC import libraries.
> >
> > * libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 (_LT_SYS_DYNAMIC_LINKER) [mingw, cygwin]
> > [p
7;t a real 'From' string.
> From: Peter Rosin
> Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 08:54:50 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] Adjust naming of MSVC import libraries.
>
> * libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 (_LT_SYS_DYNAMIC_LINKER) [mingw, cygwin]
> [pw32, cegcc] : Adjust naming of the
> import library fr
Hi Gary,
Den 2010-09-07 11:47 skrev Gary V. Vaughan:
> On 7 Sep 2010, at 16:25, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> (or are you all on the 72 hour clock since the first post?
>> I'm setting a new 72 hour clock now in case you're not)
>
> No need for that I think. As long as the testsuite is still passing on
>
Hi Peter,
On 7 Sep 2010, at 16:25, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Den 2010-09-04 16:21 skrev Charles Wilson:
>> On 9/4/2010 4:52 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>> And the testsuite runs have finished and results are the same. I still
>>> want to push this.
>>
>> I have no objections anymore, but I can't approve i
the strange date generated by git in the next line?)
>From baa6de02d18f99e65777dd8092e6a7fc1d734358 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Rosin
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 08:54:50 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Adjust naming of MSVC import libraries.
* libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 (_LT_SYS_DYNAMIC_LINKER) [mi
Den 2010-09-04 16:21 skrev Charles Wilson:
> On 9/4/2010 4:52 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>
>> If you are using -lfoo, then you *must* use 'compile' as well as cl
>> does not know about the -l option. So, I was thinking that 'compile'
>> instead of just transforming -lfoo into foo.lib would walk the li
On 9/4/2010 4:52 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>
> If you are using -lfoo, then you *must* use 'compile' as well as cl
> does not know about the -l option. So, I was thinking that 'compile'
> instead of just transforming -lfoo into foo.lib would walk the library
> search path (in the same order as cl wou
Den 2010-09-03 20:04 skrev Charles Wilson:
> On 9/3/2010 1:42 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> Den 2010-09-03 18:05 skrev Charles Wilson:
>>> This way, non-libtool unixish makefiles could always use -lfoo,
>>> regardless of whether they were linking to a static lib or dynamic lib.
>>
>> Well, -lfoo didn't
On 9/3/2010 1:42 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Den 2010-09-03 18:05 skrev Charles Wilson:
>> This way, non-libtool unixish makefiles could always use -lfoo,
>> regardless of whether they were linking to a static lib or dynamic lib.
>
> Well, -lfoo didn't work for both static and shared libs in non-libt
Den 2010-09-03 18:05 skrev Charles Wilson:
> On 9/3/2010 7:59 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> So, I'm now proposing this naming scheme instead:
>>
>> static lib: foo.lib
>> shared lib: foo-2.dll
>> import lib: foo.dll.lib
>>
>> which is a lot more consistent with the MinGW naming, i.e.:
>>
>> static l
On 9/3/2010 7:59 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> So, I'm now proposing this naming scheme instead:
>
> static lib: foo.lib
> shared lib: foo-2.dll
> import lib: foo.dll.lib
>
> which is a lot more consistent with the MinGW naming, i.e.:
>
> static lib: libfoo.a
> shared lib: libfoo-2.dll
> import
of libtool with MSVC support, than after.
So, I'm proposing this patch.
The testsuite is running. Ok to push if results look sane?
Cheers,
Peter
>From 36e3b1db468fca816f9ce36e7393436d6bbcccb7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Rosin
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:51:43 +0200
Subject: [PA
Hi!
Since I swapped to ar-lib and consequently updated it to allow
augmenting an existing archive, I've noticed stuff like this in
the testsuite logs:
libtool: link: /c/cygwin/home/peda/automake/lib/ar-lib lib cru .libs/a1.lib
a1.obj
a1.obj : warning LNK4006: _f1 already defined in a1.lib(a1.dl
19 matches
Mail list logo
