Hello,
* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 07:37:41PM CEST:
> On 09/11/2010 10:09 AM, Charles Wilson wrote:
> >However...I don't have the authority to push *anything* without
> >approval, so I *can't* simply say "pushed as obvious".
>
> It is ok for anyone with commit access to commit
On 09/11/2010 10:09 AM, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 9/11/2010 2:47 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
Den 2010-09-11 07:02 skrev Charles Wilson:
OK to push as obvious?
To me, pushing as obvious is the same as pushing without
asking (and when I do, I make damn sure I don't push anything
bad). This makes me c
On 9/11/2010 4:16 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> OK to push.
Pushed.
--
Chuck
On 9/11/2010 2:47 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Den 2010-09-11 07:02 skrev Charles Wilson:
>> OK to push as obvious?
>
> To me, pushing as obvious is the same as pushing without
> asking (and when I do, I make damn sure I don't push anything
> bad). This makes me curious, what does it mean to you?
It
Hi Charles,
* Charles Wilson wrote on Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 07:02:29AM CEST:
> * libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh (func_generate_dlsyms): Fix obvious
> typo, $sharedlib_from_linklib_cmd missing '_cmd'.
> ---
> Typo in e83da49a1faf9df1c7e351df9e9b175388d76619: there is no variable
> named 'sharedlib_from_
Den 2010-09-11 07:02 skrev Charles Wilson:
> OK to push as obvious?
To me, pushing as obvious is the same as pushing without
asking (and when I do, I make damn sure I don't push anything
bad). This makes me curious, what does it mean to you?
Cheers,
Peter
* libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh (func_generate_dlsyms): Fix obvious
typo, $sharedlib_from_linklib_cmd missing '_cmd'.
---
Typo in e83da49a1faf9df1c7e351df9e9b175388d76619: there is no variable
named 'sharedlib_from_linklib' -- the variable should be
'sharedlib_from_linklib_cmd'.
OK to push as obvious