The start of my post-release patch queue... okay to push?
* Makefile.am (doc/libtool.1, doc/libtoolize.1): Don't rely on
the intermediate files, since they might have changed without
giving make the opportunity to update the actual binaries that
help2man calls in time.
Signed-off-by: Gary V.
On 09/22/2010 11:35 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 07:05:48PM CEST:
The start of my post-release patch queue... okay to push?
* Makefile.am (doc/libtool.1, doc/libtoolize.1): Don't rely on
the intermediate files, since they might have
Hi Eric,
* Eric Blake wrote on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 07:37:58PM CEST:
On 09/22/2010 11:35 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 07:05:48PM CEST:
* Makefile.am (doc/libtool.1, doc/libtoolize.1): Don't rely on
the intermediate files, since they might have
* Eric Blake wrote on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 08:19:28PM CEST:
On 09/22/2010 12:13 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Is it acceptable instead to use a nested $(MAKE) invocation prior to
running help2man to ensure the binary is up-to-date?
Can you show a patch so I can see what you mean?
diff --git
On 09/22/2010 12:22 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Eric Blake wrote on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 08:19:28PM CEST:
$(srcdir)/doc/libtool.1: $(srcdir)/$(auxdir)/ltmain.sh
+ $(MAKE) libtool
$(update_mans) --help-option=--help-all libtool
When -jN has been passed, the two makes may both
* Eric Blake wrote on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 08:30:08PM CEST:
On 09/22/2010 12:22 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Eric Blake wrote on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 08:19:28PM CEST:
$(srcdir)/doc/libtool.1: $(srcdir)/$(auxdir)/ltmain.sh
+ $(MAKE) libtool
$(update_mans) --help-option=--help-all
On 23 Sep 2010, at 00:35, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Gary,
Hallo Ralf,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 07:05:48PM CEST:
The start of my post-release patch queue... okay to push?
* Makefile.am (doc/libtool.1, doc/libtoolize.1): Don't rely on
the intermediate files, since
Hello Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:29:44PM CEST:
On 23 Sep 2010, at 00:35, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 07:05:48PM CEST:
* Makefile.am (doc/libtool.1, doc/libtoolize.1): Don't rely on
the intermediate files, since they
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:36:01PM CEST:
On 23 Sep 2010, at 01:22, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Eric Blake wrote on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 08:19:28PM CEST:
On 09/22/2010 12:13 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Is it acceptable instead to use a nested $(MAKE) invocation prior to
On 23 Sep 2010, at 01:22, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Eric Blake wrote on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 08:19:28PM CEST:
On 09/22/2010 12:13 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Is it acceptable instead to use a nested $(MAKE) invocation prior to
running help2man to ensure the binary is up-to-date?
Can you show
On 23 Sep 2010, at 03:40, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Gary,
Hallo Ralf,
Thanks for the swift reviews again.
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:29:44PM CEST:
On 23 Sep 2010, at 00:35, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 07:05:48PM CEST:
*
11 matches
Mail list logo
