Hi Brooks, On Aug 23, 2013, at 5:52 AM, Brooks Moses <bmo...@google.com> wrote: > Based on Alan's explanation and what I could tell from looking at the code, > I've tried to expand the comments to explain what's going on, as per the > attached patch. Does this look like a useful improvement to the situation?
Perfect! And applied. Many thanks. Cheers, -- Gary V. Vaughan (gary AT gnu DOT org)
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
