Re: Fix rebuilding rules of ltmain

2007-05-01 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Gary, and sorry for the delay, * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 05:18:09PM CEST: On 28 Apr 2007, at 09:04, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Repeating the above question: OK to apply? If not, then ok to revert the 2007-03-29, 2007-03-26 changes? Certainly. In light of our new

Re: Fix rebuilding rules of ltmain

2007-04-28 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Gary, * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 02:46:23PM CEST: On 27 Apr 2007, at 00:01, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: OK to apply?[...] This seems to more or less work with the make implementations of Solaris 10, AIX 4.3.3, FreeBSD 6, and of course GNU. More or less meaning: the

Re: Fix rebuilding rules of ltmain

2007-04-28 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hallo Ralf! On 28 Apr 2007, at 09:04, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Gary, * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 02:46:23PM CEST: On 27 Apr 2007, at 00:01, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: OK to apply?[...] This seems to more or less work with the make implementations of Solaris 10, AIX

Re: Fix rebuilding rules of ltmain

2007-04-27 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hallo Ralf, On 27 Apr 2007, at 00:01, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: OK to apply? With this, if only `ChangeLog' (and `configure.ac' for ltversion.in) are newer than the respective target, we avoid updating. This fixes the bug where touch $srcdir/libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh # or edit otherwise

Fix rebuilding rules of ltmain

2007-04-26 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
OK to apply? With this, if only `ChangeLog' (and `configure.ac' for ltversion.in) are newer than the respective target, we avoid updating. This fixes the bug where touch $srcdir/libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh # or edit otherwise would fail to update ltmain.sh and thus libtool. This seems to more