Hi Gary, and sorry for the delay,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 05:18:09PM CEST:
On 28 Apr 2007, at 09:04, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Repeating the above question: OK to apply? If not, then ok to revert
the 2007-03-29, 2007-03-26 changes?
Certainly. In light of our new
Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 02:46:23PM CEST:
On 27 Apr 2007, at 00:01, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
OK to apply?[...]
This seems to more or less work with the make implementations of Solaris
10, AIX 4.3.3, FreeBSD 6, and of course GNU. More or less meaning: the
Hallo Ralf!
On 28 Apr 2007, at 09:04, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 02:46:23PM CEST:
On 27 Apr 2007, at 00:01, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
OK to apply?[...]
This seems to more or less work with the make implementations of
Solaris
10, AIX
Hallo Ralf,
On 27 Apr 2007, at 00:01, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
OK to apply? With this, if only `ChangeLog' (and `configure.ac' for
ltversion.in) are newer than the respective target, we avoid updating.
This fixes the bug where
touch $srcdir/libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh # or edit otherwise
OK to apply? With this, if only `ChangeLog' (and `configure.ac' for
ltversion.in) are newer than the respective target, we avoid updating.
This fixes the bug where
touch $srcdir/libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh # or edit otherwise
would fail to update ltmain.sh and thus libtool.
This seems to more
