On 29 May 2007, at 02:24, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Or maybe Gary will pipe up and say finished, nothing else will
change!. Gary?
Well, I'm certainly not planning on any more libltdl api changes
before the next release from HEAD. But then again, that has been the
case for some months now, and
Charles == Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I trimmed the CC list a bit.
Charles Secondly, the entire contents of libjava/libltdl/ need to be
Charles updated.
I don't think we need to do this. libgcj uses libltdl primarily as a
portable wrapper for dlopen. As such it works just fine
On Tue, 29 May 2007 12:36:13 -0600, Tom Tromey
said:
Charles == Charles Wilson writes:
Charles Secondly, the entire contents of libjava/libltdl/ need to be
Charles updated.
I don't think we need to do this. libgcj uses libltdl primarily as a
portable wrapper for dlopen. As such it
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 07:33:28PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 29 May 2007 12:36:13 -0600, Tom Tromey
said:
Charles == Charles Wilson writes:
Charles Secondly, the entire contents of libjava/libltdl/ need to be
Charles updated.
I don't think we need to do this. libgcj
[libtool-patches: please render assistance...SOS!]
Andreas Schwab wrote:
The GCC and src trees have been updated with the new libtool. Let me
know if you run into problems.
Please also commit the version of ltdl.m4 that you used.
Apologies for not catching this; I /thought/ about asking
On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 15:06 -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
[libtool-patches: please render assistance...SOS!]
Secondly, the entire contents of libjava/libltdl/ need to be updated. I
don't think it is The Right Thing, although it may be possible, to build
an old version of libltdl using a new
