* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 05:51:28PM CEST:
The patch looks ok to me. We shall see about the actual performance
improvement.
Thanks, applied.
Cheers,
Ralf
2008-04-12 Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh (func_mode_compile): Avoid
OK, this issue is much more intricate than it looked like at first.
First, the existing code had some bugs:
- it removed files too often. After the first compile, we *know* that
there are no files to stumble over; if the compiler doesn't know -c
-o, then we have moved away $output_obj
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 08:56:24AM CEST:
OK for the updated one? It makes for 5% faster
libtool --mode=compile gcc -c a.c
I should be more precise: the above holds for an empty file a.c,
measured using a script that calls the above 50 times, pre and post
patch.
I
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Then, while I have some doubts about the practical applicability of
Bob's scenario, I left the code so that it would be supported: all
Bob's scenarios are rarely practical.
I would have been inclined to ok this one.
OK for the updated one? It
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
OK to apply? I fail to see why it's necessary to remove these files.
If they existed from a previous compile, they are outdated, so what.
But I may be overlooking something here.
Removing the object file in advance
OK to apply? I fail to see why it's necessary to remove these files.
If they existed from a previous compile, they are outdated, so what.
But I may be overlooking something here.
Thanks,
Ralf
2008-04-10 Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh
