Re: Problem with LT_PATH_NM

2009-03-18 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2009-01-15 21:28 skrev Peter Rosin: (But it just papers over the real bug IMHO) I have to agree on that. Even though this is not fixing the real bug, it is the conservative thing to do, as it closes the regression. Ok to apply with this ChangeLog? 2009-01-15 Peter Rosin

Re: Problem with LT_PATH_NM

2009-03-18 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Peter, * Peter Rosin wrote on Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 06:24:50PM CET: 2009-01-15 Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se Don't settle for any dumpbin/link program as name lister. * libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 (LT_PATH_NM): When locating dumpbin or link -dump, check if they appear to really

Re: Problem with LT_PATH_NM

2009-03-18 Thread Peter Rosin
Hi Ralf, Den 2009-03-18 18:53 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: Hi Peter, * Peter Rosin wrote on Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 06:24:50PM CET: 2009-01-15 Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se Don't settle for any dumpbin/link program as name lister. This one seems really straight forward to me. So again, ok to

RE: Problem with LT_PATH_NM

2009-01-16 Thread Peter Kjellerstedt
Seems fine to me. //Peter -Original Message- From: Peter Rosin [mailto:p...@lysator.liu.se] Sent: den 15 januari 2009 21:28 To: Libtool Patches List Cc: Peter Kjellerstedt; Rudolf Leitgeb Subject: Re: Problem with LT_PATH_NM [Moving to the patches list] Peter, Rudolf, are you

Re: Problem with LT_PATH_NM

2009-01-15 Thread Peter Rosin
14 januari 2009 21:27 To: Peter Kjellerstedt Cc: bug-libt...@gnu.org Subject: Re: Problem with LT_PATH_NM Den 2009-01-14 14:29, skrev Peter Kjellerstedt: The other day I downloaded and tried to build the latest version of stable glib (2.18.4) where they apparently had switched from libtool 1.5.x