Hello,
On 22.09.2010 09:38, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Rainer Tammer wrote on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 09:35:38AM CEST:
>> --- a/README
>> +++ b/README
>> @@ -319,6 +319,17 @@ notice and this notice are preserved. This file is
>> offered as-is,
>> without warranty of any kind.
>>
>>
>> +6. Platform
* Rainer Tammer wrote on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 09:35:38AM CEST:
> --- a/README
> +++ b/README
> @@ -319,6 +319,17 @@ notice and this notice are preserved. This file is
> offered as-is,
> without warranty of any kind.
>
>
> +6. Platform specific notes
We already have doc/notes.{texi,txt}.
Cheer
Hello,
On 21.09.2010 19:59, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hello Rainer,
>
> * Rainer Tammer wrote on Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:15:47AM CEST:
>> after this patch all tests from the old test suite are OK.
> Great!
>
>> The new test suite still shows some problems but its getting much better:
> Yeah. They
Hello Rainer,
* Rainer Tammer wrote on Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:15:47AM CEST:
> after this patch all tests from the old test suite are OK.
Great!
> The new test suite still shows some problems but its getting much better:
Yeah. They pass fully with LDFLAGS=-Wl,-brtl. But the failures without
r
[ adding libtool-patches ]
Hello Rainer, all,
* Rainer Tammer wrote on Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 12:55:59PM CEST:
> here is the result of the bisect. I had to slightly change your
> suggested bisect script:
>
> if grep 'FAIL: f[c7]*demo-exec' checklog; then
> ->
> if grep '^FAIL: ' checklog; then
>
