Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 09:28:59AM CEST:
On 21 Aug 2005, at 08:21, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
No need to start working on that yet, this patch has several issues
that make it unsuitable for application.
Okay, addressed below and attached new version of the
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 06:26:23PM CEST:
Ah, yes. I see what you mean now. Unfortunately, I don't think your
patch will always work -- because of timestamp dependencies between
$prefix/share/aclocal, $prefix/share/libtool/libltdl,
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
I'm not sure libtoolize should be changed. While Bob and I agreed that
it was a good idea to have libtoolize update timestamps, this bears a
problem:
On my machine, several of the above files are installed the same second.
So, on the client machine
Noah Misch wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 07:25:00PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
On my machine, several of the above files are installed the same second.
So, on the client machine where libtoolize is executed, they will have
the same time. If libtoolize were to update time stamps, then it
Hallo Ralf,
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Another regression: on GNU/Linux, after bootstrap, configure, make:
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `dlopen.la', needed by
`libltdl/libltdl.la'. Stop.
ltdl.m4 needs to be adjusted for this, I guess. I also guess this
change will need adjustments in all
Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 09:17:50PM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Another regression: on GNU/Linux, after bootstrap, configure, make:
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `dlopen.la', needed by
`libltdl/libltdl.la'. Stop.
I can't reproduce this using either
Hallo Ralf!
On 22 Aug 2005, at 21:04, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 09:17:50PM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Another regression: on GNU/Linux, after bootstrap, configure, make:
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `dlopen.la', needed by
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 11:28:25PM CEST:
Please compare your tree with my distcheck generated tarball from:
http://tkd.kicks-ass.net/dist/libtool-2.1a.tar.gz
I don't see any code generating this.
*snip*
ltdl.m4:
...
# LTDL_INIT([DIRECTORY])
#
Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 07:38:31PM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 03:13:17PM CEST:
Thanks for the review... I've had a busy summer, so I hope you'll
forgive that it has taken me 3 months to respond :-(
Hehe,
Moin Ralf!
On 21 Aug 2005, at 08:21, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 07:38:31PM CEST:
The c++ template with subdir-objects autotest is failing for me right
now (I think this is because I need to backport another patch to my
local automake-1.9.6
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 04:59:14PM CEST:
Moin Ralf!
Good afternoon, Gary!
On 21 Aug 2005, at 08:21, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 07:38:31PM CEST:
The c++ template with subdir-objects autotest is failing for me right
now (I
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
I dunno. This is the kind of horror that makes me avoid C++ as if it
were perl ;-)
Does g++ come with a command line unmangler?
Yes, it is called c++filt. Does come with OS-X.
If libtool is using the native linker (vs linking via the compiler)
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 05:44:05PM CEST:
On 21 Aug 2005, at 16:16, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Can you get a demangled name of the symbol __Z2a2c?
I dunno. This is the kind of horror that makes me avoid C++ as if it
were perl ;-)
Bob answered this already, but if you
Hi Bob, Hallo Ralf,
On 21 Aug 2005, at 17:16, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
I dunno. This is the kind of horror that makes me avoid C++ as if it
were perl ;-)
Does g++ come with a command line unmangler?
Yes, it is called c++filt. Does come with
Hallo Ralf!
On 21 Aug 2005, at 17:35, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 05:44:05PM CEST:
On 21 Aug 2005, at 16:16, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Can you get a demangled name of the symbol __Z2a2c?
I dunno. This is the kind of horror that makes me avoid C++ as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
| I guess I'll leave that to our Darwin expert to fix, though.
|
|
| Agreed. Hi Peter!
|
Hi,
Still majorly jet-lagged (thus reading email at 5:45am :-p), but I believe
that I noted this failure:
On 21 Aug 2005, at 22:11, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
On 21 Aug 2005, at 22:00, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Still majorly jet-lagged (thus reading email at 5:45am :-p), but I
believe
that I noted this failure:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2005-06/msg00144.html
Well remembered! I'd
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
So the better workaround is to add 'export
MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.3' to
those tests rather than skip them altogether?
Hmm, no, you have to do it before you configure and build libtool. There are
other workarounds to the ld bug, but they'd involve me adding a
Hallo Ralf!
On 19 Aug 2005, at 19:51, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 07:43:56PM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Another bug:
Makefile.am:
+ $(SED) '/^# ### BEGIN /,/^# ### END / \
+ { s,libltdl_,,; s,libltdl/,,; s,: libltdl/,: ,; \
+
Hallo Ralf!
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Another bug:
Makefile.am:
+ $(SED) '/^# ### BEGIN /,/^# ### END / \
+ { s,libltdl_,,; s,libltdl/,,; s,: libltdl/,: ,; \
+ s,\$$(libltdl_,$$(,; p; }; \
+ d' $$in $$out;
This is not going to work on AIX, because the sed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This changeset requires autoconf and automake patched according to:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf-patches/2005-04/msg00028.html
But I think it is fine for HEAD to rely on CVS autoconf/automake, although
I don't want to commit until
Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 03:13:17PM CEST:
This changeset requires autoconf and automake patched according to:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf-patches/2005-04/msg00028.html
But I think it is fine for HEAD to rely on CVS autoconf/automake,
Hallo Ralf!
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 03:13:17PM CEST:
That done, a backport to branch-2-0 will require reverting to running
libltdl/configure as a subconfigure, otherwise we can't release it
bootstrapped with autoconf-2.59 and automake-1.9.5.
23 matches
Mail list logo
