On Sep 1, 2005, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yep, works for me. I went back and forth myself over --enable-pic vs.
> --with-pic. Neither is right really, and I wanted to see what everyone
> else thought.
We should have two options: --disable-pic and --disable-non-pic. Both
P
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Noah Misch wrote on Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 07:26:14PM CEST:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 12:30:35PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
* libltdl/m4/options.m4 (_LT_WITH_PIC): Renamed...
(_LT_ENABLE_PIC): ...this. Adjust all callers. The configure
option
* Noah Misch wrote on Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 07:26:14PM CEST:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 12:30:35PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> > * libltdl/m4/options.m4 (_LT_WITH_PIC): Renamed...
> > (_LT_ENABLE_PIC): ...this. Adjust all callers. The configure
> > option is now `--enable-pic', sinc
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 12:30:35PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> * libltdl/m4/options.m4 (_LT_WITH_PIC): Renamed...
> (_LT_ENABLE_PIC): ...this. Adjust all callers. The configure
> option is now `--enable-pic', since `--with-pic' implies that the
> user wants to compile
Hallo Ralf,
Thanks for the review. So much for my thinking this was a quick
5-minute patch, eh? ;-)
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 02:42:00PM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:30:35PM CEST:
This patch co
Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 02:42:00PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:30:35PM CEST:
> >
> >>This patch continues to support --with{,out}-pic[={yes,no,both}, but
> >>only advertises the more compliant --enable-pic in
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:30:35PM CEST:
This patch continues to support --with{,out}-pic[={yes,no,both}, but
only advertises the more compliant --enable-pic in the calling
configure --help text.
There is no patch attached to your mail.
Okay
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:30:35PM CEST:
>
> This patch continues to support --with{,out}-pic[={yes,no,both}, but
> only advertises the more compliant --enable-pic in the calling
> configure --help text.
There is no patch attached to your mail.
> Okay to commit?
No, see
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This patch continues to support --with{,out}-pic[={yes,no,both}, but
only advertises the more compliant --enable-pic in the calling
configure --help text.
Okay to commit?
* libltdl/m4/options.m4 (_LT_WITH_PIC): Renamed...
(_LT_ENABLE_
