Hi Jonathan,
* Jonathan Ryshpan wrote on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 08:47:55AM CEST:
There are a bunch of underfull and overfull boxes in the libtool
documentation for version 1.5.6. The underfull boxes are mildly
unaesthetic; the overfull boxes make those portions of the documentation
unreadable
Applied to all three branches.
(Extracted from Gary's babel packages' changes against 1.5.10).
Regards,
Ralf
2005-04-23 Gary Kumfert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* m4/libtool.m4 (_LT_LANG_F77_CONFIG) [ aix4, aix5 ]:
Adjust logic to match the C case: Only disable static if not
on
Dear ebay customer
Need Help?
We regret to inform you that The primary email for your ebay account was changed on Apr.22,2005
If you did not authorize this change,please contact us using the link below:
click here
and re-enter your account
Hi Gary, others,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 09:40:05AM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Another couple of questions that turned up for me and are not
dealt with in HACKING (resp. README-alpha):
Thanks for catching these! We should capture the concensus in HACKING...
Hello,
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 06:14:17PM CEST:
Could you please test this as well on your respective Solaris systems,
so we don't get a bogus 1.5.16 release? Thank you very much.
Oh Brother. This is the correct patch for
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
+
+8) Note that using libltdl in conjunction with direct uses of dlopening
+mechanisms is not supported. For example, it may work if you use
+libltdl but another library you use uses dlopen() directly, but it is
+unsupported.
What inspired the above?
Hi,
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For now it would suffice if you tried the following
(additionally to making sure there are no regressions in the test
suite): for each $CC above, go to the build dir, and execute
[snip]
$LIBTOOL --mode=link $CC $CFLAGS $LDFLAGS -static -o
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 05:13:45PM CEST:
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Suppose, the module libfoo depends on libbar.
- main calls lt_dlopen(libfoo)
- uses unrelated library libbaz
- libbaz dlopens libbar as well
- main lt_dlclose(libfoo) leads to
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
That is much better and makes the failure scenario much more clear. I
like this one.
Good. It's not completely accurate because of the deplib loading, but I
guess it's good enough. For branch-2-0/HEAD I will try to put this into
the texinfo
Hi Ralf, others,
* Ralf Menzel wrote on Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 05:02:00PM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The last two commands should compile and the binaries return 0.
OK, I get
[anarion:conv]324 ./main ; echo $?
0
[anarion:conv]325 ./main_static ; echo $?
0
for
Hi Peter, others,
* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 03:54:09PM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Oh, I'd be happy either way. If you want to do it, fine with me, too. :)
In the unlikely event that you do not upload access to ftp.gnu.org in time,
please ask me. Otherwise, thanks
Si ce message n'apparaît pas correctement, cliquez
ici.
Pour pouvoir lire cette «Information Promotionnelle» en
toute sécurité, veuillez cliquer sur le lien ci-dessous:
On Apr 23, 2005, Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-New in 1.5.15a: 2005-??-??; CVS version 1.5.15a, Libtool team:
+New in 1.5.16: 2005-04-23; CVS version 1.5.15a, Libtool team:
Erhm... If this is going out soon, could we perhaps get the patch I
posted for libtool.m4 in, to avoid
13 matches
Mail list logo
