OK to commit this patch if this one is accepted into Autoconf?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf-patches/2010-06/msg00031.html
The move the testsuite.at code above AT_INIT should have no impact
beside reordering things in the PREPARE_TESTS diversion a bit, which
should be harmless (I
Is Autoconf = 2.64 spread widely enough for Libtool development by now?
If not, that could probably be hacked around in configure.ac, but I'd
need to test with old Autoconf then.
Anyway, this updates --help output of libtool, libtoolize, and the
testsuite script to match current GNU Coding
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 01:41:47PM CEST:
Print Libtool project URL in program --help output.
* configure.ac (AC_PREREQ): Require Autoconf 2.64 for Libtool.
(AC_INIT): Set URL argument.
* Makefile.am (edit): Substitute PACKAGE_URL.
Updated patch. This one doesn't require 2.64 any more, it just sets
PACKAGE_URL itself with older Autoconfs, and it changes the PACKAGE_NAME
to GNU Libtool. The GNU prefix lets Autoconf = 2.64 compute the
right gnu.org web page automatically.
This:
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Jun 13, 2010
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 01:41:47PM CEST:
I'd like to change PACKAGE to be 'GNU libtool' eventually, but that
affects things like grepping generated .lo and .la files, and I don't
want to go there right now.
turned out to be a
